I found this video interesting and wanted to share.
Free agency did a lot of damage to the NFL, but it has been regulated so the game ultimately adjusted.This sounds much like why Saban left the NFL and never returned too. I think he made some comments at that time that the NFL changed from what it was from when he was DC for Belichick.
I said something similar in the portal thread. Could you imagine if NFL had twice annual free agency, no salary caps, and every time you had a coaching change the whole team became an unrestricted free agent?Free agency did a lot of damage to the NFL, but it has been regulated so the game ultimately adjusted.
What we have right now in college football is unrestricted pay and free agency. That is not sustainable and it will kill the game.
I think you are dead on. Back in the 80s and early 90s NFL, coaches had much great influence and impact on their players behavior. They could discipline them and the players were receptive to it.
When you tell me players were in Coach's office after the Rose Bowl wanting to know playing time status for next season and pay or they were going to transfer out? NOW you know why they have played like crap for 3 years.
Love it or hate it, the NFL has a rock solid system that produces parity, competition and enormous revenues while maintaining massive interest among fans.I said something similar in the portal thread. Could you imagine if NFL had twice annual free agency, no salary caps, and every time you had a coaching change the whole team became an unrestricted free agent?
Instead, the NCAA will try something stupid like asserting some financial interest in the players' NIL money and claim a transfer fee like in European soccer.Due to the NIL and its impact on players decisions, I think the only way to curb this clown show is to reinstate the loss of one year of eligibility for a transfer.
I’m probably in the minority nowadays, but the NFL was much better to watch before parity. It takes time to build a team and players staying together along with coaching staffs give teams more identity and personality. Without dynasties, how do you know if you’ve seen an upset? No dynasty, no giant killers. Part of the fun was watching a new coach build a staff and add talent to build the team but the current system using plug and play talent is more talent evaluation rather than team development. Parity having to be created by a sports sanctioning body tells me that sport has competitors that aren’t willing to put 110% effort into winning championships and in my opinion, takes a key element from the sport.Love it or hate it, the NFL has a rock solid system that produces parity, competition and enormous revenues while maintaining massive interest among fans.
College football could do much worse than adopting an NFL model for what is essentially an NFL-lite product.
We recently ended the greatest extended dynasty (18 years and 6 SBs) in the history of the sport in NE and we're in the middle of another dynasty with KC. And the advent of free agency saw the Dallas dynasty of the 90's.I’m probably in the minority nowadays, but the NFL was much better to watch before parity. It takes time to build a team and players staying together along with coaching staffs give teams more identity and personality. Without dynasties, how do you know if you’ve seen an upset? No dynasty, no giant killers. Part of the fun was watching a new coach build a staff and add talent to build the team but the current system using plug and play talent is more talent evaluation rather than team development. Parity having to be created by a sports sanctioning body tells me that sport has competitors that aren’t willing to put 110% effort into winning championships and in my opinion, takes a key element from the sport.