crmsnrevelation said:
verbals are ignorant, because they make the student look ignorant.
"I verbaly commit to the University of Alabama"
That is all it should take.
If I commited somewhere and then backed out and commited to UGA why would UGA want me because I am a liar.
Who says I wouldnt sabotage the team?
I say cut him because of the wishy/washy attitude.
Do you want him to play like that?
Unfortunately, that's the way recruiting is today. These kids visit, commit, then if they see something they like better, they commit there. It stinks, but it's just the way it is. These coaches have made it that way. The coaches also recruit multiple kids for 1 position & tell some of them we will offer you if so & so doesn't commit. I'm not saying any of this is good/bad/in between, but it's just how it is.
As far as one school taking a kid who has already committed, if he's that good, why wouldn't they. If they can get him on their campus & on their field playing, it means they don't have to face that person on the other side of the ball. I wouldn't turn down a kid of his caliber because he had already committed somewhere else. Committing & playing are two different things. Many kids today look at the future & try to see where they can go to get to the next level(NFL.) They also play that way. Alabama gets more of the kids that are interested in playing for the tradition of BAMA than most teams, but, generally, these kids play college to get to the next level & their commitment level does not reflect their on-field performance, IMO.
If, say, Carl Johnson the #1 OL & Florida commitment wanted to come to T-town, would you turn him down? Just curious.
RTR-stop the streak