My roommate in college smoked pot about every day. I could tell anytime he was high and it appeared to me it impaired his judgement. I have no issue of legalizing it and taxing the absolute crap of it. But its just another thing for someone to misuse and get behind the wheel of a vehicle and kill somebody. I understand there are more alcohol related car accidents than pot related but that's probably because alcohol isn't illegal and pot is. Legalize pot and I'd imagine those numbers would begin to quickly even out.
From a revenue generating standpoint we could more than likely balance the budget within ten years by legalizing and taxing it.
I've heard that argument a lot, and I understand it. However, the effects of marijuana - just like alcohol - vary from person to person. But if you are going to make that argument as an indictment of marijuana, are you not equally indicting alcohol? If so, why should one be legal while the other is illegal?
I have yet to hear even a decent argument in support of the banning of marijuana.
On the average it impairs a person less than alcohol, e.g. smoking for two hours versus drinking for two hours. It has much, much, much fewer health risks, especially secondhand, than smoking tobacco. Yet those two are illegal. It is no more psychotropic for the average person than any number of prescription medications that people are allowed to use and even drive after taking.
Smoking marijuana doesn't make you any greater of a risk to yourself or others, depending on the situation, than alcohol, tobacco, or a plethora of legally taken prescription drugs.
You can't say that for heroin, cocaine, or meth. That's why those are illegal. And those reasons were used when marijauna was first banned. Some of the supposed side-effects of marijuana were, and I quote: "loose morals and murderous fits of rage." Of course, those side-effects were listed in public information ads which were funded by, wait for it, the tobacco industry.