No judge is going to way some assumed "intention" to rule against the plain language of a statute. This is the part of the statutes applying to the defendant - "
These restrictions only apply to a person under age 18 who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun." If the judge had allowed that charge to remain and the jury convicted, the entire verdict would have been overturned on appeal. BTW, below are two .223 caliber weapons. Disregard the scope, as either or neither may be scoped. You might familiarize yourself with the assault weapon ban of 1994, where they tried to use cosmetics to determine what was an "assault weapon." The gun manufacturers easily designed around them. The magazine restriction is a separate matter. I favor it, although it's also easily circumvented...
View attachment 20582