Economy Perception And The Presidential Election

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
36,647
30,298
287
55
One of our fine posters here may have theorized the same thing (and I didn't see it) and let's make it clear before the post that I know basic economics at best, and I'm nothing close to an expert as my bank account would prove.

The economy was growing in the third quarter of 2024 at 2.8%, slightly above the summer 1992 rate of 2.7%, the year Clinton beat Bush (and Perot) running on the economy. Of course, other numbers are different. While inflation was not so bad in 1992, unemployment was over 7% as opposed to slightly above 4% right now. (Folks wondering, "How did Reagan win a thumping landslide in 1984 with unemployment at 7.5%" need to remember that unemployment had been as high as 11% less than two years earlier. And by the way, the economy had SLOWED to growth of 2.7% at the end of the third quarter of 1984, so you had a bustling economy and fewer unemployed).

Okay, we'll all grant inflation was really bad in 2021 and especially 2022, though it has subsided. I'm no longer paying $19 for the eggs at Wal-Mart or anywhere close to the $5.49 a gallon I was paying in Massachusetts in June 2022. So while they haven't returned quite as low as they were, prices have gone down some in the last two years.


But that leads me to this question:

Do you think the PERCEPTION is that prices are higher than they were because the pandemic ended is what really made it seem worse to people? In other words, I have less "disposable income" than I did in 2020 so it FEELS worse?

I don't know how it worked for whomever, okay? But I do recall a few things being basically passed as temporary measures.

- if your child is no longer in daycare because you are working at home, aren't you saving on actual daycare cost?
- if you're not driving to work or school because you're in the home, doesn't that save on gas....
-....and doesn't that mean when you do buy gas on rarer occasions, it is MUCH cheaper due to supply/demand?
- weren't student loans paused and wouldn't that give people more money in their pockets temporarily?
- wasn't rent paused, which would put A LOT MORE money in your pocket? FTR, I never missed a rent payment.
- weren't SOME car notes suspended at least temporarily, and wouldn't that put money in your pocket as well?


Okay, so now you have a bunch of money you NORMALLY would spend but didn't because of the circumstances and THEN as we go back to normal: a) you now have to pay those bills you didn't have temporarily; b) since everyone now has money and demand has increased, prices go even higher? So now inflation IS bad but SEEMS even worse because you're watching your spending skyrocket and your savings dwindle rapidly.

Am I even remotely thinking about this correctly? Have I missed something?


Side note: remember, we only have our own experiences to go on. In all honesty, MY WORK LIFE didn't really change all that much until the second and third strains hit. I got paid for 40 hours a week, I went into work every single day (except when I caught shingles and then Covid), and I wound up having to finance a car a year early because my Altima died at 229,000 miles - so I put down about 1/2 of it, and it cost a lot more. My son came home and did his university studies online, and I was given back about $3100 for his last semsester room.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: UAH

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
85,572
42,755
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
One of our fine posters here may have theorized the same thing (and I didn't see it) and let's make it clear before the post that I know basic economics at best, and I'm nothing close to an expert as my bank account would prove.

The economy was growing in the third quarter of 2024 at 2.8%, slightly above the summer 1992 rate of 2.7%, the year Clinton beat Bush (and Perot) running on the economy. Of course, other numbers are different. While inflation was not so bad in 1992, unemployment was over 7% as opposed to slightly above 4% right now. (Folks wondering, "How did Reagan win a thumping landslide in 1984 with unemployment at 7.5%" need to remember that unemployment had been as high as 11% less than two years earlier. And by the way, the economy had SLOWED to growth of 2.7% at the end of the third quarter of 1984, so you had a bustling economy and fewer unemployed).

Okay, we'll all grant inflation was really bad in 2021 and especially 2022, though it has subsided. I'm no longer paying $19 for the eggs at Wal-Mart or anywhere close to the $5.49 a gallon I was paying in Massachusetts in June 2022. So while they haven't returned quite as low as they were, prices have gone down some in the last two years.


But that leads me to this question:

Do you think the PERCEPTION is that prices are higher than they were because the pandemic ended is what really made it seem worse to people? In other words, I have less "disposable income" than I did in 2020 so it FEELS worse?

I don't know how it worked for whomever, okay? But I do recall a few things being basically passed as temporary measures.

- if your child is no longer in daycare because you are working at home, aren't you saving on actual daycare cost?
- if you're not driving to work or school because you're in the home, doesn't that save on gas....
-....and doesn't that mean when you do buy gas on rarer occasions, it is MUCH cheaper due to supply/demand?
- weren't student loans paused and wouldn't that give people more money in their pockets temporarily?
- wasn't rent paused, which would put A LOT MORE money in your pocket? FTR, I never missed a rent payment.
- weren't SOME car notes suspended at least temporarily, and wouldn't that put money in your pocket as well?


Okay, so now you have a bunch of money you NORMALLY would spend but didn't because of the circumstances and THEN as we go back to normal: a) you now have to pay those bills you didn't have temporarily; b) since everyone now has money and demand has increased, prices go even higher? So now inflation IS bad but SEEMS even worse because you're watching your spending skyrocket and your savings dwindle rapidly.

Am I even remotely thinking about this correctly? Have I missed something?


Side note: remember, we only have our own experiences to go on. In all honesty, MY WORK LIFE didn't really change all that much until the second and third strains hit. I got paid for 40 hours a week, I went into work every single day (except when I caught shingles and then Covid), and I wound up having to finance a car a year early because my Altima died at 229,000 miles - so I put down about 1/2 of it, and it cost a lot more. My son came home and did his university studies online, and I was given back about $3100 for his last semsester room.
No, I think you're very close to sensing the perception of the public. On an objective basis, the Biden administration did a miraculous job of rescuing us from what could be an abyss. My personal economy differs from the general, in the fact that I'm somewhat isolated, both in what I do and, to some extent commodity prices. At first, I was puzzled that Biden wasn't getting any credit at all. Just as the axiom that things are never as bad as they seem nor as good, Biden is/was better than he seemed. There are other aspects of intelligence than thinking on your feet, always his Achille's Heel. He made some very good decisions, far more than Trump has/will/is likely to make. Added to a very primitive view of the economy, there is something subtle at work. The world is viewed by many Americans as in chaos. The generation of us who experienced genuine chaos has almost died out. There's no doubt that there's a reaching out for the strong image - "Only I can fix it." That urge in mankind for the imaginary strong leader is still present in the public, as it has been for multiple millenia...
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
23,375
15,782
337
Hooterville, Vir.
Three points.
Inflation is like weight gain. If I weigh 150, and I gain ten pounds this year, and 5 pounds the year after, that does not mean I have improved, I have gotten worse more slowly. To return to 150, I have to actually lose weight. With inflation, it got worse more slowly in 2024, but it did not return to pre-pandemic price level, which would have required deflation, which was not close to happening.
Two, during the pandemic, there was a lot of pent-up demand. Once the restrictions were removed due to the pervasiveness of the vaccinated/recovered, that pent-up demand was going to burst onto the economy regardless of what the federal government did. All the federal government had to do was get out of the way and the economy would recover from the coma the federal government had put it in due to the pandemic. Then the federal government decided to dump trillions of dollars onto an economy set to take off. The predictable (and inevitable) result was inflation: too many dollars chasing too few goods.
Three, the president does not have as much influence on the economy as some folks might think. He traditionally gets too much credit and too much blame. Those arguing that he does "determine" the level of economic activity should be asked to name the policy and explain in a disciplined manner, how that cause brought about this effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AWRTR

JDCrimson

Hall of Fame
Feb 12, 2006
5,976
5,744
187
51
Alot of what happened over the last 4 years would have been significantly muted...

1) if the government while releasing $9T in stimulus along with the stay at home wealth effect had implemented a temporary increase in corporate income taxes. This would have incentivized companies toward higher worker compensation and greater investment in supply chains.

2) without the temporary corporate tax, the American consumer was just a conduit for corporateAmerica to suck the government stimulus and stay at home wealth out of the economy stoking inflation.

3) Baby Boomers are worth $85T and starting in 2022 Wall Street money market funds started paying 5% almost overnight sucking and an unbelievable amount of liquidity out of the economy to such a degree it caused a liquidity crisis in banking. The loss of liquidity to savings increased inflation in production because workers are still hard to find and retain. Stoking inflation.

4) The Fed raised the yield curve 500bps over a few short months changing the cost of capital such thst it is stoking even more inflation when it is trying to control it. Again, there is not enough capital in the economy.

We are all just victims of a giant cash grab. And this will keep happening to us without effective corporate rax policy. We are just the middleman And that's why we feel the way we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92tide

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!


Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads