Thanks, CA. That's good information.
It is point-to-point, 40 years in between -- not trendline over 40 years vs. what we see today (which analysis would have its own set of shortcomings).
Still, assuming for a minute that 1985 is substantially representative of 1985 - 2025, it looks like the max temps aren't the real change. It's the minimum temps.
As in, the charts don't show it getting that much hotter today than it did in the past. The real difference they show is that it doesn't cool off as much at night.
Even then, I'd have a question about the minimum temps in June of 1985. Chart says 0, and the graph represents that for a bunch of days. I don't know what the issue is, but I know we didn't have a low of 0 degrees on any day in June of 1985, let alone a bunch of them. And we didn't have an average low of a hair under 24. I can't tell how that affects the other minimum and average numbers, but it certainly raises questions.
So something's off. My best guess would be that, for whatever reason, they didn't have any observations for a while, and recorded that as 0. If -- two big letters -- that's right, the minimum (and possibly average) numbers are significantly misleading, especially when included as part of a trendline.
I also see that the chart says we had no rain the entire month of June. Seems unusual, even in a dry year. But maybe so. I do remember some dry summers during that time frame. That could account for the max temp in June of 1985 of 99, whereas in June of 2025 (an unusually wet month) it was 94.
Even that doesn't get into a comparison of the heat indices.
You may know that I'm into the geeky stuff about production of wine. Observations from a lot of US wine grape growers in Napa and the Willamette Valey are consistent with that. As in, they say that they can handle the 105 degree daily high temps, even in Oregon. It's the minimum 85 degree nights that cause the problem.