Link: 2026 Transfer Portal

I almost feel like we are becoming a school that develops some kids for other high paying schools to poach. I hate this. Someone hit the lottery and let's have some fun
Which i think is where recruiting starts changing. It isn’t about signing a full class of 4 and 5 stars to develop and paying them substantial dollars as freshman. I think it will be finding that handful of guys that are “play readiy” and will contribute significantly as freshman. Players like Brooks, Lee, and Carroll this past season. And hopefully keep them 2-3 years. The others 15 or so in class provide serviceable depth, but it doesn’t kill you if they jump ship after a year.
 
I never heard of Hollywood Smothers until recently and Cam Coleman fumbled the last play of the Iron Bowl for Auburn. So.... meh! How good was their last team?
That's it. We need team players. Certainly, they need ability but if they are mature, coachable and have the measurables then the team player type is what the doctor ordered.
 
OK, once more. Evaluations are not a part of CM's job. That is on the coaches as they know what player attributes they are looking for.

So if you had CM's job, what would YOU do differently?
If all CM does is handle the contracts/player negotiations, thats only done twice a year. What does he do the rest of the time? Contracts arent negotiated on a weekly or monthly basis.
 
Then the University built a 47 million dollar golf practice facility? If they're not using close to 105 scholarship's it's malfeasance, not a money issue.
The golf facility was built with $13 mil current donations and a loan of from the Athletic Dept of $34 mil which is to be repaid with donations in the coming years. We didn't spend NIL dollars to build a driving range.
 
The golf facility was built with $13 mil current donations and a loan of from the Athletic Dept of $34 mil which is to be repaid with donations in the coming years. We didn't spend NIL dollars to build a driving range.
Hmm, let's walk through this. First off, a 34 million dollar loan is massive. I guess you're more plugged in than me though because I saw explicitly where it came from the University, not that it was guaranteed to be paid back by boosters (I've had previous discussions about this and done previous research, assumption was boosters were involved to a greater extent). So in the least it was a lavish interest free loan. I assumed some boosters wanted it though, or else why do something so dumb?

People sometimes seem confused on how NIL works. There are now two buckets. One is the university, the other is "donations". Also, annual interest in a 34 million dollar loan would be about 1.5 million. They could add a dozen scholarship players for that amount.

Let's just contemplate this though.

Alabama boosters can afford a 47 million dollar golf practice facility.
They can not afford to compete with boosters from other teams though, Alabama is too poor for that.

Can afford a 47 million, for golf. Which earns no money for the university
Football though, which earns over 100 million a year? Too poor...

TLDR money was wasted on a golf practice facility that could have gone to the football program.

Why do people comment and make assumptions without doing just a little bit of research; and apply common sense. Thanks
I have posted about it multiple times and even broke down the numbers. I know how much the university put up, it's in my post history.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TD7 and Cruloc
The golf facility was built with $13 mil current donations and a loan of from the Athletic Dept of $34 mil which is to be repaid with donations in the coming years. We didn't spend NIL dollars to build a driving range.
Why do people comment and make assumptions without doing just a little bit of research; and apply common sense. Thanks
 
For the record according to 247, Alabama has the 49th ranked portal class, this after losing 20 guys via the portal. They started out with staff chirping about how they weren't losing anything of importance.

Clearly this is just about money though, since college football heavyweights like Kentucky and Arizona St. have top 10 portal classes. To put it in another context, Alabama now has the second worst portal class in the conference.

And mind you, if they were racking up on sleepers I'd be alright with it and say let's wait to see how these guys pan out. But it's still as of this moment a single digit class, even counting the walk-on tight end!
What rank was Indiana last year? I think they were around 30 or so. Pretty amazing when they are supposedly the team we have to follow.
 
One of my all time fav sports movies.......

What that movie doesnt emphasize enough is that you have to play the game the way that can get the optimum value out of the players you can afford. You aint going to win a bunch of baseball games manufacturing runs by stealing bases with a bunch of old players.

Same with football, you better be able to coach to the talent you can acquire.
 
What rank was Indiana last year? I think they were around 30 or so. Pretty amazing when they are supposedly the team we have to follow.
25th, but they had 23 guys. Lots of sleepers, including their second leading rusher this year, the Heisman winner, etc...

So they did great evaluations. Meanwhile Alabama was ranked 21 with only 12 guys. Higher evaluations from the recruiting service, but far worse results. All the four stars from that class are already gone.

My issue here is a lack of quality or quantity. They're listed as 5 players right now. Ranked 54. So it isn't like oh may be there's a lot of sleepers in there that are under-rated. There's not a lot of anything.

This with roster expanding to 105 and 20 players leaving via the portal.

Just off the top of my head I think there's
-19 out of eligibility or leaving via the draft.
-20 via portal.

23 recruiting
5 portal

I think I saw a number of 83 scholarship players, but this is all back of the napkin math so don't take it as gospel. Even if I add in the 3 guys that are not currently listed (one is a walk-on for sure) and then do the math here's how it looks:
75 out of 105 roster slots used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cruloc
What that movie doesnt emphasize enough is that you have to play the game the way that can get the optimum value out of the players you can afford. You aint going to win a bunch of baseball games manufacturing runs by stealing bases with a bunch of old players.

Same with football, you better be able to coach to the talent you can acquire.

My Top 4......

1. We Are Marshall
2. North Dallas Forty
3. Remember the Titans
4. Moneyball
 
If the corollary is MLB, the Yankees have not won a World Series in a minute so having the highest payroll doesnt necessarily guarantee a championship.

That being said, again referring to Moneyball, if we dont improve in the portal we may not have someone to catch the ball when we throw it to 1B. We literally dont have an experienced Center or LOT right now.
 
Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest threads