Political Meme - Cartoon/Joke Thread...Part XXXII

Status
Not open for further replies.
Morrison Hotel - the fifth studio album by the Doors was released on February 9, 1970, by Elektra Records.
The band needed an album cover to perfectly match their record. Ray Manzarek set out to find a good location to photograph the group, subsequently discovering Morrison Hotel, which is no longer open. The address is 1246 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, although if you visit, you’ll simply find a boarded-up building covered in posters. The fact that this cheap hotel shared a name with the lead singer seemed perfect. Thus, photographer Henry Diltz and Gary Burden, an art director, they headed over to the building.
Unfortunately, the receptionist wasn’t keen on the band having a photoshoot there, so they had to rub their heads together and find a way around the obstacle. The answer was easy – wait for the receptionist to go for a break and sneak into the window. The Doors were successful, quickly posing in the window behind the words ‘MORRISON HOTEL’, with Diltz standing outside.
The grainy image is the perfect encapsulation of the record, which is about an America that is far from glamorous and polished. The band look contemplative and confronting – neither happy nor sad, seemingly observing the streets in front of them in the same way that Morrison was keen on observing the state of America through his lyrics.
It took Diltz many attempts to take the best shot, trying his best to get the name of the hotel in the frame without capturing the reflection of himself in the window. However, in the chosen image, you can actually see his reflection if you look close enough. Additionally, the back cover of the record features an image of The Hard Rock Cafe, an old bar on Skid Row a few blocks away from Morrison Hotel. According to Diltz, the founders of the popular Hard Rock Cafe chain, which was founded in 1971, were inspired by seeing the name of this old bar, founded in the ‘30s, on the Morrison Hotel album packaging.
Source: Aimee Ferrier / Far Out
The Doors, 'Morrison Hotel' Album Cover Outtake, 1969 by Henry Diltz

628807183_1402816511641830_6172888677353124214_n.jpg
 
YBVoLC2QiyTS.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bazza
I'm going to repeat it. Everyone who says they "support" the SAVE act needs to read it in detail. I, for one, would never be able to vote again, if I let my passport expired...
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: 92tide and UAH
I'm going to repeat it. Everyone who says they "support" the SAVE act needs to read it in detail. I, for one, would never be able to vote again, if I let my passport expired...
It appears to be less onerous than the RealID standards:
(b) Documentary proof of United States citizenship.—As used in this Act, the term ‘documentary proof of United States citizenship’ means, with respect to an applicant for voter registration, any of the following:

“(1) A form of identification issued consistent with the requirements of the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates the applicant is a citizen of the United States.
“(2) A valid United States passport.
“(3) The applicant's official United States military identification card, together with a United States military record of service showing that the applicant's place of birth was in the United States.
“(4) A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government showing that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
“(5) A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State or Tribal government other than an identification described in paragraphs (1) through (4), but only if presented together with one or more of the following:

“(A) A certified birth certificate issued by a State, a unit of local government in a State, or a Tribal government which—

“(i) was issued by the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;
“(ii) was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State;
“(iii) includes the full name, date of birth, and place of birth of the applicant;
“(iv) lists the full names of one or both of the parents of the applicant;
“(v) has the signature of an individual who is authorized to sign birth certificates on behalf of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government in which the applicant was born;
“(vi) includes the date that the certificate was filed with the office responsible for keeping vital records in the State; and
“(vii) has the seal of the State, unit of local government, or Tribal government that issued the birth certificate.
“(B) An extract from a United States hospital Record of Birth created at the time of the applicant's birth which indicates that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
“(C) A final adoption decree showing the applicant’s name and that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States.
“(D) A Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States or a certification of the applicant’s Report of Birth of a United States citizen issued by the Secretary of State.
“(E) A Naturalization Certificate or Certificate of Citizenship issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security or any other document or method of proof of United States citizenship issued by the Federal government pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act.
“(F) An American Indian Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security with the classification ‘KIC’.”.


I'm not sure how one can prove US citizenship if they lack all of these documents.
 
In general terms, few will argue against Voter ID requirements being a good thing. But the REAL STICKY POINT of the issue is who does not have an ID that is acceptable when voting. Typically poor, disabled, older adults, and college kids don't have valid IDs for voting in these laws. And the political reality is that more of those folks are Democratic voters, meaning it's a win for the Republicans to disenfranchise those folks.

However, if in the Voter ID bills, an honest and effective method to ensure every person easily gets an ID and can use those IDs to vote, then you'll see more folks in favor of the actual laws, not just the idea of secure elections being presented to them.

This is truly solution to stop a tiny fraction of illegal votes, reported as up to .001%. But voter ID laws butt up against a population of up to 11% of people that don't have a valid ID for voting in many cases. To do the math, there's 11,000 times more folks that might lose the right to vote than folks that illegally vote. So for every illegal vote potentially stopped by voter ID laws, 11,000 American Citizens might not be able to cast their vote.

Even if there's a hundred times more illegal votes than we know about. It still makes zero sense to disenfranchise so many voters.

I'd be fine with good, honest, well designed voter ID laws created by independent commissions that end up working to maximize the number of voters that can and do vote, but most of these laws are simply Trojan Horses.


 
  • Thank You
Reactions: 92tide
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads