The Decline of the DNC IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's one perspective on his comments and the 2025 bill that was being debated:

I'm always open to a different perspective, but this opinion piece didn't exactly prove what Wiener is saying. He can say it's disproportionate, but without any supportive data, it's just going to come off as one guy's hopeful opinion. In any case, Wiener should do himself a favor and strongly consider how others are going to interpret what he is saying before he speaks. Even if his intentions are good, optics are still everything in politics. (And yes, I know it shouldn't be that way, but it is.)
 
Imminently qualified. Still pretty sharp, though he was never a details guy. Not always the most eloquent fellow: "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.” Way too old.

Kerry was eminently qualified in 2004, too. He ran a horrible campaign during which the only thing l learned about him was he “went to Vietnam!”

While l think the Swift Boating was wrong, Kerry left himself open to that when he - for reasons that contradict all logic - refused to release his military records until 2006.
 
I again remind you for anyone that thinks this party is any better, no they are not. First Jay
“ I want to murder my opponent” Jones and now a Nazi tattoo guy who they have to give a pass because “he’s polling well.”

But it’s a choice of taking a stand against something reprehensible without excuse or “my party must get power”, and the Democrats are no different than the Republicans no matter what folks you want to say or hope or believe.

 
I’m cutting him some slack on the tattoo. I had never heard of this Nazi symbol before.

I'm willing to cut him some slack on the tattoo - when he was young.

Given his own campaign manager resigned after not only finding out about the tattoo but he also got found out posting stuff on Reddit such as:

He wondered why Black people don’t tip. He blamed women who had been raped for getting too drunk. He casually used homophobic slurs and insulting language for people with disabilities. He called all cops “bastards” and rural white people “racist” and “stupid.” And he called himself a communist and member of the Democratic Socialists of America.

For 11 years now, we've all been subject to - AND I AGREE WITH THIS - with "why won't Republicans speak out against Trump, protect the guardrails, stand up for what's right" - and now the same people who were saying that have the opportunity to strangle a campaign that could do the same thing to their own party in its cradle, they act like Kay Ivey's "well, I want a Republican Senator" when giving Roy Moore a pass.

If this was as simple as "well, he got a tattoo and didn't know it's symbolism," I'd be on his side. And I AM on his side in that he appears to be an honorably discharged veteran suffering from PTSD in his service in the "forever wars" of the Bush administration. But he compounded that goof with the kinds of posts that (IMHO rightly) kept a Tidefans poster from getting appointed a judge, his excuse on why he didn't remove it ("I'm not near a tattoo removal parlor") rings hollow, and it's not just isolated to the one thing.


Throw in the fact this guy was an accomplished actor as a child, and I have to wonder how much of anything he says is truthful.


So yes, I agree that if it was just this one thing, young folks do make mistakes.
Problem is - it isn't just this one thing. It almost never is.
 
Fair enough. I haven’t paid much attention to him beyond the tattoo issue and seeing his Everyman campaign ad.

But the alternative will be 79 when the term begins. (Susan Collins will be 74 that day).

I don’t know how much of his stuff became public before his campaign got going but they need to vet their candidates better or at least find someone else better. Surely some 40-ish state senator has dreams that could use some nudging.
 
The intent behind the tattoo is up for debate, but those despicable tweets from a few years ago are not. Democrats must do better than this.
Why? This might change the vote of a handful of independents, but not as many as one might think. The Dems and Reps won't be moved at all by this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads