Semiquincentennial of the American Revolution

250 years ago today, Washington is back with the army on New York.
Meanwhile, back in Philadelphia Richard Henry Lee of Virginia introduces a resolution:

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.
That it is expedient forthwith to take the most effectual measures for forming foreign Alliances.
That a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation.

John Adams of Massachusetts seconds the motion.
 
250 years ago today, the British begin sailing from Nova Scotia, headed for New York City.

In New York, Washington is writing dispatches, trying to administer the to the needs of the army, to right then ship in Canada, and understand what happened at the Battle of the Cedars, outside Montreal in which a superior force of Americans were defeated by a handful of Loyalists and a couple of hundred Iroquois. American affairs in Canada are not going well, due to a combination of indiscipline, disease, corruption, and bad luck.
 
There were inapparent reasons Canada was a hard nut for the lower Colonists to crack. They never won over the Quebecois. Although Francophone, they felt they, and their Catholic faith, was much safer as British subjects than under the rabidly anti-Catholic lower colonists. Also, even at that time, the lower population had begun to diversify into a more pan-European color than the Canadian UK/French. That difference in diversity maintains to the present. The anti-Crown sentiment which would be sufficient to feed rebellion just wasn't there...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
There were inapparent reasons Canada was a hard nut for the lower Colonists to crack. They never won over the Quebecois. Although Francophone, they felt they, and their Catholic faith, was much safer as British subjects than under the rabidly anti-Catholic lower colonists. Also, even at that time, the lower population had begun to diversify into a more pan-European color than the Canadian UK/French. That difference in diversity maintains to the present. The anti-Crown sentiment which would be sufficient to feed rebellion just wasn't there...
In an era in which leaders on both sides of the Atlantic were not given to acts of moderation and conciliation, Parliament's Quebec Act of 1774, guaranteeing freedom of worship and restoring French property rights, was both conciliatory and successful in gaining the loyalty of the francophone Quebecois.
Protestants in the lower 13 complained bitterly and those denunciations came back to bite the Americans in the backside.
 
There were inapparent reasons Canada was a hard nut for the lower Colonists to crack. They never won over the Quebecois. Although Francophone, they felt they, and their Catholic faith, was much safer as British subjects than under the rabidly anti-Catholic lower colonists. Also, even at that time, the lower population had begun to diversify into a more pan-European color than the Canadian UK/French. That difference in diversity maintains to the present. The anti-Crown sentiment which would be sufficient to feed rebellion just wasn't there...

Note for the current era... We invaded Canada once... It didn't end up so well...
 
250 years ago today, Washington, now back in New York, writes to Hancock that he has a "confident report" that British troops have embarked in Halifax, Nova Scotia and are headed for New York. British "troops are hourly expected at the Hook" (Sandy Hook, New Jersey).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
Also on this day in 1776, Congress postponed consideration of the resolution on the secession of the colonies until 1 July so that some of the colonies' delegations might have time to receive instructions from their home legislatures.
In the meantime, "that no time be lost," Congress decided to appoint a committee to draft a "declaration to the effect ... 'That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states.'"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
250 years ago today, Congress decided who would serve on the committee tasked to draft a declaration of independence: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston.
John Adams suggested Thomas Jefferson draft the declaration. When Jefferson asked why, Adams told him, "first, you are a Virginian, and a Virginian ought to appear at the head of this business. Reason second, I am obnoxious, suspected, and unpopular. You are very much otherwise. Reason third, you can write ten times better than I can."
"Well," said Jefferson, "if you are decided, I will do as well as I can."
 
250 years ago today, Congress decided who would serve on the committee tasked to draft a declaration of independence: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston.
John Adams suggested Thomas Jefferson draft the declaration. When Jefferson asked why, Adams told him, "first, you are a Virginian, and a Virginian ought to appear at the head of this business. Reason second, I am obnoxious, suspected, and unpopular. You are very much otherwise. Reason third, you can write ten times better than I can."
"Well," said Jefferson, "if you are decided, I will do as well as I can."
That’s amazing
 
250 years ago today, Congress decided who would serve on the committee tasked to draft a declaration of independence: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston.
John Adams suggested Thomas Jefferson draft the declaration. When Jefferson asked why, Adams told him, "first, you are a Virginian, and a Virginian ought to appear at the head of this business. Reason second, I am obnoxious, suspected, and unpopular. You are very much otherwise. Reason third, you can write ten times better than I can."
"Well," said Jefferson, "if you are decided, I will do as well as I can."
Of course I have to post this:
 
That’s amazing
I think Abraham Lincoln was a great speaker. Thomas Jefferson was a great writer. In fact, the disparity between Jefferson's writing ability and his speaking ability was such that, when president, he would write out his state of the Union addresses and send them over to Congress in written form.
 
250 years ago today, Virginia, which was in the process of crafting a republican state constitution, adopts the Virginia Declaration of Rights (drafted by George Mason):

Virginia Declaration of Rights

I
That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

II That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.

III That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.

IV That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge be hereditary.

V That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinct from the judicative; and, that the members of the two first may be restrained from oppression by feeling and participating the burthens of the people, they should, at fixed periods, be reduced to a private station, return into that body from which they were originally taken, and the vacancies be supplied by frequent, certain, and regular elections in which all, or any part of the former members, to be again eligible, or ineligible, as the laws shall direct.

VI That elections of members to serve as representatives of the people in assembly ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community have the right of suffrage and cannot be taxed or deprived of their property for public uses without their own consent or that of their representatives so elected, nor bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assented, for the public good.

VII That all power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority without consent of the representatives of the people is injurious to their rights and ought not to be exercised.

VIII That in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man hath a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he cannot be found guilty, nor can he be compelled to give evidence against himself; that no man be deprived of his liberty except by the law of the land or the judgement of his peers.

IX That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

X That general warrants, whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.

XI That in controversies respecting property and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred.

XII That the freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.

XIII
That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and be governed by, the civil power.

XIV That the people have a right to uniform government; and therefore, that no government separate from, or independent of, the government of Virginia, ought to be erected or established within the limits thereof.

XV That no free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.

XVI That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.
 
To point out what I feel are some significant points from the Virginia Declaration:

  • It is wrong to force anyone to exercise a religion, but all have a duty to practice Christian forbearance, love and charity. (That is an interesting way to phrase it.)
  • "The militia" consists of the body of the people, trained to arms.
  • Only a despotic government would try to restrain a free press.
  • Only those who have demonstrated a common interest in and attachment to the community should vote.
  • Holders of elective offices regularly should be returned to the status of private citizens so they live under the laws they make. (Term limits).
  • The majority of a community have the right to abolish the government when it does not meet its intended ends.
  • Officeholders are the servants of the people who elected them.
  • All men are free and equal and are born with certain rights.

As you can see, a lot of these carry over to the Federal Bill of Rights.
 
That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
Mason's work is brilliant, but it is interesting that he based human rights in our individuality and personhood -- as granted by the state, not as coming from "God."

Compare to the DOI preamble: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
 
Mason's work is brilliant, but it is interesting that he based human rights in our individuality and personhood -- as granted by the state, not as coming from "God."

Compare to the DOI preamble: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
I am not sure I agree with that interpretation. All Mason says is that rights are "inherent," not where they come from, whether they come from the state, God, or simply by virtue of being human. Jefferson's assessment is clearer.
 
On June 7th, the resolutions proposed by Richard Henry Lee contained three main clauses: draft a declaration of independence, "a plan of treaties to be proposed to foreign powers," and draft "a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation."

250 years ago today, Congress appointed the members of the committee to draft the plan of confederation (which would eventually result in the Articles of Confederation), one member of Congress from each state:

for New Hampshire Mr. [Josiah] Bartlett
Massachusetts Mr. S[amuel] Adams
Rhode Island Mr. [Stephen] Hopkins
Connecticut Mr. [Roger] Sherman
New York Mr. R[obert R.] Livingston
New Jersey [a player to be named later]
Pennsylvania Mr. [John] Dickinson
Delaware Mr. [Thomas] McKean
Maryland Mr. [Thomas] Stone
Virginia Mr. [Thomas] Nelson*
North Carolina Mr. [Joseph] Hewes
S. Carolina Mr. [Edward] Rutledge
Georgia Mr. [Button] Gwinnett
 
250 years ago today, Washington writes to Gen. Sullivan, in command on the Canadian front: "I think every mark of friendship and favor should be shown them (Canadians), to encourage their zeal and attachment to our cause, and from which if they once heartily embark we shall derive innumerable benefits." On the other hand, Washington tells Sullivan, "I must caution you not to put too much to the hazard in your exertions to establish her (Canada's) rights, and to receive with a proper degree of caution the professions the Canadians may make. They have the character of an ingenious, artful people, and very capable of finesse and cunning. Therefore my advice is, that you put not too much in their power; but seem to trust them, rather than do it too far. I would also have you to keep all your posts, as you goe, well secured, to guard against any treacherous conduct."

The relationship with the Canadians is a complicated one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huckleberry
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads