Bama Game Thread: CFP Selection Show details (12p-4p EST ESPN): Times, where to watch; Selection show 'game thread'

Yeah…
penn st will skull drag smu
notre dame will thump indiana
texas will obliterate clemson
only good game might be Ohio st vs Vols
The way this season has gone, I would not bet on any of them.
 
The problem with the Vandy loss, if the offense hits their stride and scores early, gets a lead, you take Vandy out of their run game. Thats how Tennessee beat them handily. Make Pavia a passer and he’s just average, make him a triple option guy, and he is deadly

but, Vandy started with the ball, took several minutes to score a TD, then we get the ball and promptly throw a pick six. We down 14 and the first drink wasn't even gone yet.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: BamaInCummingGA
It is a lie.

The worst part is you have a bunch of morons that no nothing about football - (why was an ex woman's basketball player in there) - who are going, oh, look how great SMU played in the second half. Apparently they didn't realize they were watching two mediocre teams playing each other. So, bad vs bad looks like a good game. If SMU had been playing Texas or Georgia there would have been no comeback. First, Clemson clemsoned, then SMU clemsoned right back. It almost looked rigged.
 
The worst part is you have a bunch of morons that no nothing about football - (why was an ex woman's basketball player in there) - who are going, oh, look how great SMU played in the second half. Apparently they didn't realize they were watching two mediocre teams playing each other. So, bad vs bad looks like a good game. If SMU had been playing Texas or Georgia there would have been no comeback. First, Clemson clemsoned, then SMU clemsoned right back. It almost looked rigged.
They are gaslighting us.
 
But it was a good loss!

:ROFLMAO:

I'm literally not even upset, as the CFP invitational has already shown it's not about crowning the best team as NC. It's a joke, which sadly is what much of CFB is quickly becoming.
Yeah everyone on X is going on about losing to two 6 loss teams. Nuance is never going to work with those people.

There was a scout on there that was talking about the reason SEC coaches are going to be so upset is that there are at least 8 teams in the SEC that would beat SMU based upon NFL talent alone. There was a response to that along the lines of, well then we are just letting the NFL draft dictate the playoff rankings. No… it literally means the SEC teams are playing an exponentially more difficult schedule than the likes of SMU.

🤷‍♂️

There is no winning this debate when people are only interested in equality of results and only equality as defined by them. And when you are the hegemonic power, well good luck getting sympathy or a hint of fairness.

As I said earlier, Sankey made a deal with the devil. He expected they would be satisfied with a seat at the table. In fact now they demand equal or better treatment.

All that said, yes Alabama has problems. We need to be prepping for 2025 yesterday.
 
The basketball selection committee doesn't put out the 68 teams every week

I was thinking this as well.

The committee starts to paint itself into multiple corners as soon as the first rankings of the season come out. A big chunk of the data points that they are so big on take place after the first rankings in November.

Yes! I hate that part of this. Nothing more than contrived TV drama.

You nailed it; this is why they do it. It is hard to respect the process when they are going for TV and media ratings.
 
The worst part is you have a bunch of morons that no nothing about football - (why was an ex woman's basketball player in there) - who are going, oh, look how great SMU played in the second half. Apparently they didn't realize they were watching two mediocre teams playing each other. So, bad vs bad looks like a good game. If SMU had been playing Texas or Georgia there would have been no comeback. First, Clemson clemsoned, then SMU clemsoned right back. It was rigged.
FIFY
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krymsonman
I’m just going to say this because I’m a nfl fan too. But when you are a bubble team it never fails that a FG in a random game will knock you out of the playoffs. I’ve seen my Steelers get knocked out on the last week countless years after playing a brutal AFC North schedule just because someone in the AFC West hits a FG on the last week of the season.

The thing is, living on the bubble is rarely a fair situation, and often it can be cruel in how the bubble gets popped. So it’s best not to do things yourself to find yourself on the bubble to begin with. Namely… don’t lose to people you have no business losing to.
 
I think the SEC will get the format changed to something more favorable in 2026. But if they don't, the league office definitely needs to find a way to ease up on the conference schedule. We shouldn't give ABC/ESPN great games to profit off of and then get left out of the playoff.
Haven’t read this whole thread to know if this has already been discussed, but based upon the “work” of this committee, it’s safe to assume that the oft- rumored SEC/B10 separate playoff will come to pass sooner rather than later. This year it was the SEC getting hosed - next year it may be the B10. Why let the SMUs, AZ states, Boises and Clemsons pick the pockets of much stronger teams from more competitive conferences?
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads