My concern is if that's good for facing SEC competition consistently. The talent Alabama had was basically built along the lines of what Georgia, Texas, and Ole Miss did in emulating it. It wasn't an especially complicated recipe,get guys that can enable you to physically dominate. Michigan was able to physically dominate Washington for example, with a similar recipe.
I know the counter is that Alabama wasn't doing that as well the past few seasons, but we're still talking about only 4 regular season losses in 3 seasons and two playoff appearances. Still top level and as I alluded to earlier, the cupboard wasn't exactly bare. If that isn't what DeBoer wants, I'm a bit wary of what he does want. If Justice Haynes doesn't fit your system, I'm not sure I trust your system.
So honestly, I'm pretty scared what DeBoer's system needs to operate, because I'm not sure how compatible that is with consistent SEC success. You know I'm not a big fan of this relying on the QB thing, I think it's putting a lot of strain in Ty, but there is no ingredient to DeBoer's system that does anything else. If anything he's going to move further in that direction, not away from it. So, what happens when this team starts to look more like Washington (who for the record was pretty loaded that last season, a couple dozen 5 and 6th year seniors, 10 NFL draft picks, etc...) only playing a brutal SEC slate?