One reason that I, much to the consternation of some other posters,kept bringing up Barnes was not because I thought he was a long term solution, not because I thought he was a perfect hire, but because he represented in more than one way what Alabama was facing.
Barnes represents unrealistic expectations (19 out of 20 NCAA tournaments, isn't good enough), a proven coach, the short term solution to a gamble on an unproven coach, what was available, and finally how fast a coach can be hired.
Alabama is now faced with the possibility that Auburn, Miss. State and Tennessee all end up with coaches that get better results. I don't think Alabama was wrong to go after Marshall, but it was too slow (I think most of us saw that and started to see things going down the drain), and far too out in the open.
This doesn't mean that Battle gets the hire wrong, but if it's "Little Pitino", he did... at best Pitino would have to learn on the job. If it's Prohm, he did (one NCAA tournament in 4 years?). Archie Miller I could stomach, at least he's been to the Elite 8...
But, Alabama desperately needs someone in there that knows what he's doing. Someone mentioned Lon Kruger and that type of coach would be great as a plan b. Someone who doesn't have to learn, someone who already knows. Someone that can put the program on the right track and not get dominated by the likes of Pearl, Barnes, and Howland. Hopefully someone comes out of the woodwork.