Toggle sidebar

Trump deeds and misdeeds VI

NationalTitles18 said:
I vacillate between this and he would to stay out of jail but would make himself out as the victim (like always).
Click to expand...
There's no part of Trump that makes me think he's anything other than soft.

IOW, I agree, he'll 100% take a plea deal if offered, then try to rouse up his supporters to do who-knows-what...
 
Jon said:
response to Galloway

Click to expand...
Her article has a fatal flaw. Although she just brushes over it near the end, in none of those prior suits was his own skin and breathing free air at stake, as it is this time. IOW, the whole article is apples and oranges. If she thinks he'll let it go down to the point of standing in the dock, waiting to hear his sentence and hoping the SCOTUS will help him, she's really out of tune with his personality. She says he's opaque. I agree with that. He's opaque to her...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg
NationalTitles18 said:
Click to expand...
This is an entirely bogus argument on the part of the defense. There are two totally separate crimes being investigated, committed in totally different jurisdiction. The constitution actually has a provision that an alleged crime be tried in the jurisdiction where committed. That means, normally, totally different grand juries...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NationalTitles18, Jon and 92tide
  • Like
Reactions: NationalTitles18
I bet there are plenty of cases they could have cited and made the same point. But they chose one of the most racially charged cases of the 20th century. That is either being completely tone deaf or done on purpose to charge up the base.
 
Crimson1967 said:
I bet there are plenty of cases they could have cited and made the same point. But they chose one of the most racially charged cases of the 20th century. That is either being completely tone deaf or done on purpose to charge up the base.
Click to expand...
it's just another part of their oh so clever "pwning" the libs.
 
Apparently, in Georgia the law gives Fulton County copyright of mugshots so any profits made from commercializing such an image could be recovered as damages by the owner of the copyright. I imagine this is not an issue that often arises in the course of normal business. The former guy made $7M off an image of which he does not own copyright.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Jon, 92tide, PaulD and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads

Top Bottom
Back