Trump's Policies Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bodhisattva

Hall of Fame
Aug 22, 2001
22,328
3,689
287
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida
What do you think the legitimate fix is here? I imagine a lot of spend it or lose it next year going on. You think just mandating a 5% reduction or whatever across all agencies would work?

Again I don't agree with what and how DOGE is doing things, but I do agree we need to cut things. it seems like if you tell the agencies to cut 5% they would know the best parts to trim for the least amt of pain.
It's a mess. How do you start trimming the fat on a pig the size of a mountain? Where do you start? The people in/near government don't want anything cut. Just the opposite - you could never spend enough to satisfy them. That's how spending increased by nearly 50% in five years. The "temporary" federal spending became permanent just like anyone who pays attention knew it would.

I have talked about the endless ways government wastes your money while making it sound good. One way I encounter regularly is that a certain percentage of contracts must be given to small businesses. Sounds good to a lot of people. But is it really? Most of the time, these small businesses were created (usually by former government workers) only to get government contracts. And they are not creators of widgets; they resellers of what other companies make. So, the government buys from a contrived SB at extremely inflated prices. And many of these SBs are "small" in name only. They are small if the government says they are small. (Look at the special treatment Hawiian companies get. Start a business; fine a Hawaiin figure head; get fat on government contracts!) Many are massive companies that do business with the government nationwide ... at extremely inflated prices. (I don't care who gets the contract, as long as the requirement can be met at the best price. That's how it is supposed to work but hasn't in a long time.)

So, I'm not sure this can be fixed from the inside. No one inside wants to or will even admit there is a problem. That's why - although it is far, far from ideal - I'm willing to see what happens with DOGE. But mostly all they can do is highlight the waste. It's up to Congress to cut the fat in any meaningful say. They have to shrink budgets and fully eliminate some departments (e.g. Education) because they don't have a constitutional justification and/or don't make any economic sense. Do I expect Congress to actually do much? No, unfortunately.
 

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,355
83,562
462
crimsonaudio.net
My problem with all this is nothing is big picture, and I don't really think the GOP wants to do anything to fix it and they are really just doing all this now to show "savings" to justify more tax cuts (which as you say is the last thing we need.) It would be pretty easy to balance the budget if they really wanted to without blowing up the economy like this.
I fear you're correct. I mean, it's a safe bet based on the last few decades we've sen from the repubs.

I still remain hopeful, though, even though I doubt we see what we want.
 

crimsonaudio

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 9, 2002
68,355
83,562
462
crimsonaudio.net
Attorney General Andrew Bailey: I am demanding the DOJ investigated whether President Biden’s cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval. If true, these executive orders, pardons, and all other actions are unconstitutional and legally void.
For the record, I see this as 'red meat' for the repubs - nothing will happen but it will give the guys on the right something to cheer about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Amazon Deals for TideFans!

YouTheFan Alabama Desk Pad

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads