May be a stupid question, but it won't be the first one I've asked. For those more knowledgeable about the finer points of the game: Why is good route running so important to the passing game?
Please understand, I'm not talking about being in the entirely wrong place on the field. If the WR breaks out to the sideline when he's supposed to run a post, the problem is more a flat-out mistake than a sloppy route.
There are just so many variables that influence precisely where the WR is on the field relative to the QB at any given instant -- where the WR is lined up at the snap, if he's in motion at the snap, the speed of his motion, whether the DB gets a good chuck at the line, the speed and direction of the QB's drop, whether he's under pressure and how he reacts to that pressure, etc., etc., ad infinitum.
It would seem to the untrained eye (mine) that all those factors would overwhelm any minor advantage gained by making a cut here vs. two feet over there.
But I'm picking up that one reason the passing game is expected to be better in 2010 is that more experienced receivers run better routes. I'm also picking up that a small deviation in the route makes a big difference in the completion percentage.
So what constitutes a good route? As a fan watching from the stands, are there any telltale signs of good vs. bad route running I could watch for?
Please understand, I'm not talking about being in the entirely wrong place on the field. If the WR breaks out to the sideline when he's supposed to run a post, the problem is more a flat-out mistake than a sloppy route.
There are just so many variables that influence precisely where the WR is on the field relative to the QB at any given instant -- where the WR is lined up at the snap, if he's in motion at the snap, the speed of his motion, whether the DB gets a good chuck at the line, the speed and direction of the QB's drop, whether he's under pressure and how he reacts to that pressure, etc., etc., ad infinitum.
It would seem to the untrained eye (mine) that all those factors would overwhelm any minor advantage gained by making a cut here vs. two feet over there.
But I'm picking up that one reason the passing game is expected to be better in 2010 is that more experienced receivers run better routes. I'm also picking up that a small deviation in the route makes a big difference in the completion percentage.
So what constitutes a good route? As a fan watching from the stands, are there any telltale signs of good vs. bad route running I could watch for?