Those photographs of the concrete are nasty. From experience, COAs are notoriously stingy about spending money. I'm sure they didn't like this report at all...
Those photographs of the concrete are nasty. From experience, COAs are notoriously stingy about spending money. I'm sure they didn't like this report at all...
I remember reading somewhere that each condo owner would have to put up 100K for the needed repairs. I would imagine most couldn't manage that.Those photographs of the concrete are nasty. From experience, COAs are notoriously stingy about spending money. I'm sure they didn't like this report at all...
I agree that it’s highly unlikely but this isn’t a completely true statement eitherHighly unlikely??
Did Navy blast cause Surfside condo collapse?
The earthquake happened 100 miles off the coast of Florida and experts are weighing in whether it could have had anything to do with the Surfside condo collapse almost a week later.www.local10.com
I’ve designed things in south Florida and around Memphis/New Madrid and there some significant differences.“On that basis, a building designed to South Florida standards should survive your average earthquake in California,” he said.
I should have added that it depends on what is meant by your average California earthquake. I would expect a building designed for South Florida winds to do just fine in a 3.9 mag that's 100 miles away though.I agree that it’s highly unlikely but this isn’t a completely true statement either
I’ve designed things in south Florida and around Memphis/New Madrid and there some significant differences.
I read a figure not quite that high, around $83K, IIRC, but still a significant financial strain, particularly for those on fixed incomes...I remember reading somewhere that each condo owner would have to put up 100K for the needed repairs. I would imagine most couldn't manage that.
Unless the blast was set off on rock, and the building was built on rock, I couldnt imagine any effect. 100 mile of water will dampen a big blast.I agree that it’s highly unlikely but this isn’t a completely true statement either
I’ve designed things in south Florida and around Memphis/New Madrid and there some significant differences.
It's the opposite. Soft soils amplify the effects. You modify the design forces based on the soil type. The softer the soils, the higher the design forces.Unless the blast was set off on rock, and the building was built on rock, I couldnt imagine any effect. 100 mile of water will dampen a big blast.
As soon as you wrote that, I thought of the filled areas of San Francisco which liquefied in both the 1906 and 1989 quakes...It's the opposite. Soft soils amplify the effects. You modify the design forces based on the soil type. The softer the soils, the higher the design forces.
I guess I was thinking more on velocity. Although if they set that blast st or near the ocean surface I can’t see how appreciable force would make it to the shore, as the water’s pretty deep there.It's the opposite. Soft soils amplify the effects. You modify the design forces based on the soil type. The softer the soils, the higher the design forces.
They've now resumed...Rescue efforts resume at collapse site; demolition planned
Rescue efforts at the site of a partially collapsed Florida condominium building have resumed after a 15-hour pause for safety concerns, and officials say they are planning for the likely demolition of the remaining structure.apnews.com
Way too early to conclude that.Didn’t hurt either
No it’s not. Global warming did not cause that rebar to rust and did not cause them to fail to perform maintenance.Way too early to conclude that.
I looked at a building once that partially collapsed 2x. Both times it was because they didn't clean the goose poop out of the roof drains and they didn't have overflow scuppers.Accounts are starting to come out of infighting on the COA board, with resignations, etc. This is probably because the bill for deferred maintenance had risen so high...
No it’s not. Global warming did not cause that rebar to rust and did not cause them to fail to perform maintenance.