Bull! You keep bring up this idea that Twitter is a "town square". Well, guess what. If continually try to set off a bomb in the middle of town square, your right to go there will be taken away. Trump used the platform to try and destroy this country, he, and all his supporters, deserve to be silenced.But that doesn't mean he should be silenced from a space that's so integral as to how many communicate now.
Bull! You keep bring up this idea that Twitter is a "town square". Well, guess what. If continually try to set off a bomb in the middle of town square, your right to go there will be taken away. Trump used the platform to try and destroy this country, he, and all his supporters, deserve to be silenced.
Last I checked he hasn’t been convicted of anything resembling “destroying the country.” Right now sane people recognize that he is harmful to national discourse, unity, and mental health. No matter how much we want to believe that what he has done rises to the level of inciting riots and general malaise, it was twitters own policies that finally removed him from the platform. Not a government imposed restriction or anything of the like.Bull! You keep bring up this idea that Twitter is a "town square". Well, guess what. If continually try to set off a bomb in the middle of town square, your right to go there will be taken away. Trump used the platform to try and destroy this country, he, and all his supporters, deserve to be silenced.
Wonder if he got those tweets approved and if they fell under the SEC order for that.On the news this AM, they said he tweeted first that the deal was "on hold," then tweeted later that it was going forward...
approval is merely a nuisance to the awesomeness of Donald MuskWonder if he got those tweets approved and if they fell under the SEC order for that.
Haha! So true.approval is merely a nuisance to the awesomeness of Donald Musk
Could it be that he was intentionally trying to tank Twitter's stock and cause Tesla's to rise? The link isn't any help with that, though. It's about him not being able to simply pay the $1B fee and walk away without further consequence.This is just a ruse. He says he "doesn't have enough information yet." That's laughable. He probably knows more about Twitter than the people who run it. Or Trump...
Actually, that one billion walkaway fee turns out to be inaccurate. There's a specific performance clause in the contract. IOW, either party can force the other to carry through with the purchase. Of course, there's the problem of going to court to force the reluctant purchaser to buy something he's decided he doesn't want. Musk would tie it up in the courts for years, during which time Twitter would be in limbo, not able to sell itself to any other buyer, etc. They'll settle for the breakup fee...Could it be that he was intentionally trying to tank Twitter's stock and cause Tesla's to rise? The link isn't any help with that, though. It's about him not being able to simply pay the $1B fee and walk away without further consequence.
Elon Musk can't just walk away from his Twitter deal by paying a $1 billion breakup fee
Musk can't just walk away from buying Twitter, despite a $1 billion reverse break fee attached to the deal.www.cnbc.com
I never gave it better than 50-50...Elon Musk: Twitter deal cannot progress without proof on bot numbers
Tesla CEO and world’s richest person expressed concerns about presence of fake accounts on platformwww.theguardian.com