I don't think whether or not Alabama would have beaten Georgia in the rematch with a healthy Metchie and Williamson has any bearing on the CFP committee disrespecting (or not) Alabama in the rankings so far. That is what I am saying, just to clarify, which may not make a difference in how you would respond.
Rest assured I am not simply using them as an excuse. I am outright saying that's why Georgia won the game, and that had even only Williamson remained healthy, we win the game. He was running behind their secondary the second time around, just like the first time, which again, is a thing that happened in reality. What I am not doing is saying Georgia needs to turn in that trophy, because I am not saying injuries aren't a part of the game. They are, most unfortunately. I would almost never say this when it comes to injuries. But I will point it out every time when I see Colt/Texas 2009 used as a comparison.
You mention 1996 Florida/FSU. I recall FSU got away with a ton of late hits on Danny Wuerffel in the first game in Tallahassee. The 2nd time around, after listening to Steve Spurrier complain about it for a month, the refs called the game more cleanly. Also, Spurrier went to the shotgun formation almost that whole game which alleviated FSU's pass rush. So yeah, the second game was played a lot differently, and Florida probably would have won the first one if FSU wasn't the beneficiary of some serious home cooking.
Again, these are 2 different situations that Texas/Alabama in 2009. There was no second game to rectify or verify the results of the first.