If Pruitt would have stayed our DC he would probably be considered one of the All-Time greats in CFB.Biggest mistake Pruitt ever made. If you lie down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.
Saban would also probably have 1 more title.If Pruitt would have stayed our DC he would probably be considered one of the All-Time greats in CFB.
I’ve never been a coach, so I struggle with understanding why Elite COs are never satisfied with being the Best… they HAVE to try and be a HC.
I'm sorry, was this directed at Fulmer or Pruitt???Hope he doesn't commit suicide by falling down his stairs repeatedly.
Pruitt. Hope he doesn’t get Logan Young’dI'm sorry, was this directed at Fulmer or Pruitt???
So what if he does name names? And so what if one or more of them admit it in court? What they did wasn't illegal in the criminal or civil sense. Only in the sense of the NCAA rules on eligibility....IOW, a prohibition against playing professional players.
None of those exist anymore.
The NCAA's authority to levy and enforce a show-cause strikes me as an entirely different issue. I never understood how they could do that anyway.
The possibility of the NCAA and Fulmer conspiring is also interesting. Fulmer almost certainly gave us up to the NCAA in exchange for them sweeping both the T Martin and the academic fraud issues under the rug. It's no big leap to think he gave up Pruitt in exchange for skating himself and thereby getting to keep his seven-figure goodbye kiss from UTe.
Still, given where we are in college sports, I don't see the significance of naming boosters. Even if he has irrefutable hard evidence that they did pay players.
Given the rules, such as they are today, on what grounds?He better have the receipts from the boosters or he will be covered up in defamation cases the next day...
I think you mean up his stairs. That's what I recall.Hope he doesn't commit suicide by falling down his stairs repeatedly.
The problem is that none of what he was fired over and crucified by the ncaa is related to boosters. It is because he, his staff, and his wife were accused of directly paying players… which is still against the rules today. So aside of causing Tennessee a mild sinus headache, what is the goal here?Given the rules, such as they are today, on what grounds?
It seems to me that if boosters can admit to having paid players back in the day with impunity, they can’t be defamed by such accusations.
IOW, even if the evidence is soft, where’s the defamation?
The problem is that none of what he was fired over and crucified by the ncaa is related to boosters. It is because he, his staff, and his wife were accused of directly paying players… which is still against the rules today. So aside of causing Tennessee a mild sinus headache, what is the goal here?
The problem is that none of what he was fired over and crucified by the ncaa is related to boosters. It is because he, his staff, and his wife were accused of directly paying players… which is still against the rules today. So aside of causing Tennessee a mild sinus headache, what is the goal here?
Agreed. I know he's suing for $100 million. But I'm guessing the real aim is to get at least some of his buyout, which UTe refused to pay.
The circumstances around Young's death and the destruction of the lawyer's office (his name escapes me at the moment) are suspect.Pruitt. Hope he doesn’t get Logan Young’d
He might be able to fix it where boosters had to dis-associate?The circumstances around Young's death and the destruction of the lawyer's office (his name escapes me at the moment) are suspect.
But there's no reason for UTe or some yahoo boosters to do that to Pruitt. At least, not because he might go public with specific names. Even if boosters are named, and even if Pruitt has it on video, backed up by bank records (which I doubt he does), the NCAA is 0-for-its-last-zillion court cases and has already said they wouldn't investigate pay-for-play that took place before the O'Bannon decision.