Isaiah Bond - Undrafted

rolltide_21

Hall of Fame
Dec 9, 2007
12,531
9,356
187
NW AL
Assuming the allegations remain just that- allegations- if he wants to play football looks like the UFL is in his future.
 

gtgilbert

All-American
Aug 12, 2011
4,132
7,444
187
I'm not sure that he will. Im not saying he won't play or that he will have some success. But I do not believe that he will be a star.
Coming out of their spring game, Haynes was very clearly RB 1A and it appears the running game will be a big part of their plan next season so if they live up to expectations I'd expect him to have a very good year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg

deltatider

1st Team
Nov 29, 2005
965
614
117
44
Bond’s situation makes him the poster-child for what I think is one of the more underrated down-sides to the transfer portal/NIL era of college football. With these guys transferring in and out of programs like they now do, a lot of the current era of players will never really be associated with a program once their playing days are over…

Think about how many of these college football players that are good at the college level and good enough for a few years in the NFL but not good enough to stick around long enough for life changing money. A good number of those end up back in their college towns (or at least back in the state where they went to college) and earn good livings based purely on their attachment/association with their school.

Bond could have been a folk hero with Bama fans forever on end following his catch on the Gravedigger play and would have been in a good spot to earn a nice living based on name recognition alone….but he and a large number of these current players will realize they really don’t have a “home” so to speak once they hang it up.
 

bamaslammer

All-American
Jan 8, 2003
4,624
1,423
282
Argo, AL, St Clair
www.kirkwoodhouse.com
When a player is having success in a given program, like Bond was at Alabama. He naturally assumes if he transfers somewhere else that he can have more. Especially if that somewhere has a more proven QB etc... Plus saban leaving etc.... The reasons many players left were valid on their face. However a football team is a complex living organism. So many things that are hard to see can effect a player both negatively and positively. Who they compete against for playing time, the techniques the position coach uses, the design of the offensive system from the OC. Plus you trained in one program and switched to another and that alone may take time to acclimate too. The way the strength coaches choose to train you. Heck even the random people on campus. When a player at the top of the playing rotation leaves he is taking a big chance that some of that may effect him in a negative way, but of course they will just assume nothing but bigger things, and of course they are told by the recruiting staff as much. Alabama got better results from Bernard who we replaced his spot with.
 

BamaInBham

All-American
Feb 14, 2007
4,686
2,545
187
Coming out of their spring game, Haynes was very clearly RB 1A and it appears the running game will be a big part of their plan next season so if they live up to expectations I'd expect him to have a very good year.
What does it matter, he’s gone I thought he was going to be a great player at Alabama and he had flashes as a freshman, e.g., the Michigan game. But last year he was bad, with a couple of long runs vs weak competition that inflated his numbers. It was like his heart wasn’t in it. It seemed best he leave. (BTW, I don’t blame for leaving: it’s anyone’s prerogative, Saban recruited him, the new Bama offensive focus is away from the running game. OTOH, if his heart was in it, IMO, he could have been the featured back, and his running style (vision, quick feet, not power) seems to fit this offense better than Saban’s. But he didn’t want it.)

But again, who cares? He didn’t care for Alabama. He’s gone.
 

Ledsteplin

Hall of Fame
Nov 20, 2013
7,201
7,937
187
72
Florence, Alabama
Bond’s situation makes him the poster-child for what I think is one of the more underrated down-sides to the transfer portal/NIL era of college football. With these guys transferring in and out of programs like they now do, a lot of the current era of players will never really be associated with a program once their playing days are over…

Think about how many of these college football players that are good at the college level and good enough for a few years in the NFL but not good enough to stick around long enough for life changing money. A good number of those end up back in their college towns (or at least back in the state where they went to college) and earn good livings based purely on their attachment/association with their school.

Bond could have been a folk hero with Bama fans forever on end following his catch on the Gravedigger play and would have been in a good spot to earn a nice living based on name recognition alone….but he and a large number of these current players will realize they really don’t have a “home” so to speak once they hang it up.
You're right. And had he stayed in T-Town, he very well may have continued to develop as a WR, and end up elite. But in Texas, he faced a new system and stiff WR competition, and ended up an average decent WR. He had no "gravedigger" type receptions at Texas for his resume.
 

Elefantman

Hall of Fame
Sep 18, 2007
6,515
4,972
187
R Can Saw
You're right. And had he stayed in T-Town, he very well may have continued to develop as a WR, and end up elite. But in Texas, he faced a new system and stiff WR competition, and ended up an average decent WR. He had no "gravedigger" type receptions at Texas for his resume.
But when a defense gives the QB twelve and a half hours to throw the ball, you are bound to get open.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dathbama

gtgilbert

All-American
Aug 12, 2011
4,132
7,444
187
You're right. And had he stayed in T-Town, he very well may have continued to develop as a WR, and end up elite. But in Texas, he faced a new system and stiff WR competition, and ended up an average decent WR. He had no "gravedigger" type receptions at Texas for his resume.
That's not really what happened.

He got injured. Prior to the injury he was:
  • leading the team in receiving.
  • leading them in 3rd down conversions
  • had the most explosive catches
  • was tied for the team lead in TD catches.
  • also had 2 rushes, one for a TD.
He wasn't stuck in the rotation or something like that due to stiff WR competition. He was a starter and was on track for a very good to great year. He just never got all the way back to full speed post injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg

Ledsteplin

Hall of Fame
Nov 20, 2013
7,201
7,937
187
72
Florence, Alabama
That's not really what happened.

He got injured. Prior to the injury he was:
  • leading the team in receiving.
  • leading them in 3rd down conversions
  • had the most explosive catches
  • was tied for the team lead in TD catches.
  • also had 2 rushes, one for a TD.
He wasn't stuck in the rotation or something like that due to stiff WR competition. He was a starter and was on track for a very good to great year. He just never got all the way back to full speed post injury.
I had not paid much attention to him, until after his injury, which I didn't know about. Makes sense to me now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtgilbert

some_al_fan

1st Team
Jan 14, 2024
414
658
117
Bond was not drafted not because of his injury or his on-field performance.
He was not drafted because of his legal issues. And these legal issues could’ve happened anywhere. It is more about what kind of person he is rather than about Texas vs Alabama's offensive scheme or QB.