Keep in mind also: Texas, for all of their financial advantages relative to other programs, didn't make the playoffs this year. Miami is perceived to have barely made the playoffs, and were written off before the TAMU game. Unless you're an IU football player/coach posting on TideFans, no one gave IU a chance to even make the playoffs, let alone win the Big 18 conference. My point is, much like CNS has said on TV, spend the money you have, but there's no guarantee that the money spent directly equals enough wins to win a NC.
Like the NFL, unfortunately, our expectations as Alabama fans has to be on "Do we have a chance to play for a national championship?" Based on the results of this season, that answer is yes - made the playoffs, won the 1st round. Based on the results of CKD's 1st season, no - didn't make the playoffs. You need to have the guy that can give you the best chances to play in the playoffs. I root the San Francisco 49ers, and there have been seasons where Kyle Shanahan made lemonade out of the lemon circumstances he was given, made the playoffs, and even got deep in the playoffs. In seasons where he had a legit team, he's made the Super Bowl. He hasn't won the SB yet, and hopefully he will. But he gives the 49ers a chance to make the playoffs more often than not, and that's a tremendously more than some other NFL teams can say in the time he's been the HC of the 49ers.
I'm of the opinion as pure outsider, that CKD and his staff are betting on player development to help the team rise to the top. CNS had sorta the same opinion once transfer rules were liberalized in favor of the player - build the team from recruiting, get a transfer for a spot here and here. Jameson Williams and Jahmyr Gibbs would be 2 of those examples. I do think CKD still needs more time. I do think at times, Alabama has looked soft when they played the last 2 years. I think the issue is more coaching or even S/C-related than HC-related.