I’m not sure that 7 out of 213 equals tons of overlap on the ICE issue, but I’m certainly frustrated that these democrats voted for the bill.NOT posting this to ‘blame the dems’, just pointing out that despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, there’s a ton of overlap between the two sides in DC.
I’m not anti-ICE as a whole, but for those that are, voting for this is dumb.
View attachment 55316
ice was going to be "funded" regardless of what happened on that bill. this administration is not bound by the law in any meaningful wayI’m not sure that 7 out of 213 equals tons of overlap on the ICE issue, but I’m certainly frustrated that these democrats voted for the bill.
Many Alabamians I see aren't so keen to have an extra judicial army with a budget larger than the majority of defense budgets on the globe operating outside of ordinary legal protections.States that cooperate with ICE vs those that do not.
I get it, I’m just answering why you’re seeing what you are. States that work with ICE have had TONS of illegal aliens arrested, it’s just not headline news as the police are reporting their arrests and it’s happening as it’s designed to.Many Alabamians I see aren't so keen to have an extra judicial army with a budget larger than the majority of defense budgets on the globe operating outside of ordinary legal protections.
States that support ICE trampling constitutional rights v those that don't.States that cooperate with ICE vs those that do not.
Okay.States that support ICE trampling constitutional rights v those that don't.
In Trump supporting states, Trump's thugs aren't running roughshod over the constitution. Yay?Okay.
I mean, in states that work with ICE most of the people detained are held by local police after being reported. I’ve not heard of many doors being kicked in in states where the local police actually work with ICE rather than antagonizing them.
Tomato, tomato in your world, I guess.
![]()
Yes, it's a win.In Trump supporting states, Trump's thugs aren't running roughshod over the constitution. Yay?
"Sanctuary states" (and cities) are operating entirely within their rights as allowed by the US Constitution, unlike Trump and his brutish and unqualified police force. That is the issue.Yes, it's a win.
They shouldn't regardless, but "sanctuary states" who refused to work with ICE (even before Trump ramped them up) are part of the issue, as evidence by those states that cooperate.
Submission is the only answer.if only they would have complied with dear leader, they wouldn't have to be punished like this
In Republican-leaning states, 59% of ICE arrests occur in prisons and jails. Conversely, in Democratic-leaning states, ICE is more likely to arrest immigrants from the community, with 70% of arrests taking place at worksites, streets, and during mass roundups.
Many of those arrested in these states have no criminal record, according to CNN.
If we value peace, we'll give up our rights. Not the usual conservative message.if only they would have complied with dear leader, they wouldn't have to be punished like this