Good quiz. Thanks. I got them all right after multiple guesses for each question.
You realize you've provided a list of things (infrastructure, public schools, social programs) that cost far more money than they should thanks to the government?
And here we have the liberal Godwin's Law except this argument really has no bearing in this thread. We pay state and local taxes that are supposes to take care of these things, but the federal government would rather take money from people in each state only to send it back to the states and tell them how to spend it. You see, conservatives think things like you mentioned would be better served locally rather than federally. I also love how you bring SSI into your point, like people aren't forced to pay into it their whole life but are hypocrites if they expect to get what they are promised. Typical liberal, the only people you want getting anything from the government are people who have paid nothing into it.
You're welcome. Enjoy the self-esteem.
Not yet but if I keep reading these ridiculous liberal ideas I may be there soon.
What's hypocritical is how conservatives always rant about how socialism is the evilest of all evils, except they practice it all the time. Granted, there are many degrees of socialism. Public schools on one end, estate tax on the other. But it's still socialism. Just admit it.
How do you think states like Alabama, and many others, would do if they didn't have the financial support from the feds?
Come on, that was at least a stand up double.
Alabama wouldn't need help from the Feds if they would stop taking so much from the people in the state and let that money stay in Alabama. In other words, higher state taxes and lower Fed taxes. How does it make sense for the Feds to take money from the people to only send it back to be spent the way they choose? Feds should just get enough money to support the military and run the government in the smallest possible way.
