I'd have to disagree with that statement. GMac had a few games that were better than Jalen vs. Clemson in 2016.
2009 SECCG says hi.
I'd have to disagree with that statement. GMac had a few games that were better than Jalen vs. Clemson in 2016.
Yes, he carried us through most games, but at the same time he became a liability at his position in games as well. Even in games we ultimately won. Jalen hit a developmental wall and the better defenses started taking advantage of it.
Yah. You're absolutely right.Here's the catch: Jalen came to be taught, to become more than what he is. He didn't come to be an rpo back, he came to learn to be an NFL ready quarterback. He knows his own weaknesses and is trying to address them, I just think a better quarterback (in the mechanical sense) has come along at an inopportune time, at least for him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The entire thread in a nutshell. My hat's off to Jalen-he did a great job, and did ALL that he could. His ONLY problem is that Tua is a better quarterback. Not a knock on Jalen, just a fact.Jalen's issue is less about him not being good and more about Tua just being that much better.
It will be interesting to see what, if any, stats are released from tomorrow's scrimmage.
I honestly believe anybody who has ever played organized football and understands the elements of being a QB can see that Hurts does not have the skill set to be a pro style QB. Looking back, if the type QB CNS wants is packaged in Tua, why did he recruit Hurts? Did he truly want a DT QB or was he influenced by Kiffin? Questions that don't really matter now, but it appears that Hurts was done a disservice in his recruitment, except for the opportunity to play for CNS. If you want what is best for the team then let's hope they both stay, if you want what is best for the player then no one should begrudge either of them if one transfers.
Hurts was signed and on campus a year/season earlier.
Hope to have both Jalen and Tua for the duration of their collegiate careers.
I understand that Hurts had already played as a freshman when Tua was signed. My point was if CNS wanted a pro style QB why did he recruit Hurts?
Agree. Also think that the original idea was to develop Jalen into a pro-style QB. That was explicitly stated. The problem was that Jalen started much more quickly than anyone envisioned, that along with the fact that Kiffin was the OC (who used what he had well, but did not spend much time developing the QB), meant that Jalen's strengths were accentuated and his weaknesses were avoided rather than developed. Thus, Jalen's and Bama's desire to develop him as a passer never materialized as they originally envisioned. But CNS's desire has always been to have a balanced O in the sense of the ability to both run and throw, not that that means there are necessarily the same number of runs as passes.I think that Saban wanted someone who could run an RPO offense, which is why he brought in Jalen. As it turns out, Jalen has not been good enough at the "P" part of the RPO offense, turning it into a run option offense.
I think that Saban is done with this experiment.
I think that Saban wanted someone who could run an RPO offense, which is why he brought in Jalen. As it turns out, Jalen has not been good enough at the "P" part of the RPO offense, turning it into a run option offense.
I think that Saban is done with this experiment.
I honestly think Hurts was far less of an experiment than some people seem to think. Did Saban want some mobility from the position? Sure, but he actually tried that dating all the way back to Fanuzzi. Tua is mobile as well, but I think it is easy to forget Hurts is actually younger than Tua. In an alternate reality, the guy could be a redshirt freshman this year, he just ended up in a position where he's an 18 year old starting at Alabama. That wasn't the plan though, obviously.
I'm also pretty sure the plan wasn't for Hurts to play under four different offensive coordinators either. I am tempted to say the expectations were for Hurts to develop more as a passer, but on what timeline? He's still a teenager. He never really got a chance to develop for a few years under a stable situation, under someone that knew how to develop QBs. He wanted to develop as a passer, but I don't think he or anyone else expected that to be a quick process. I'd assume that was the hope from the start, to develop over time, and while that ship might have sailed (at Alabama at least, remember he could transfer, sit a year and play two more) it would be pretty rational to hope to develop his passing game over three or four years on campus.
I wasn't expecting anything, just curious what might get out.I wouldn't look for much of anything.
Occasionally, word leaks out, but I wouldn't expect much officially.
All that I’ve seen so far is that Tua had 15-20 reps and did well (accurate etc.)I wasn't expecting anything, just curious what might get out.
Or Barnett . . .It really got messed up when we couldn't get Cooper Bateman elevated to a game managing QB in 2016. So that Jalen could redshirt or just come in situationally. Go along with the fact that Kiffin did virtually nothing to develop the QBs we had.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk