Because it exposés uncomfortable truths about the profitability of some of their core beliefs on the market.
I think we are looking at this from totally different perspectives.
I don't care about the business choices and consequences of a multi-national conglomerate.
But this is the intersection of that and the politics of hate.
And what drove this change in the market is very much hate and hate is the underlying force behind it all - else making a few cans for an obscure personality would have made no difference in the lives of anyone complaining about it.
Some of us are more concerned about the underlying issue.
Others are concerned about other things.
I'm not even certain that everyone can agree that hate was the driving force for the market change and some seem upset when anyone points that out, even assuming they can admit that.
Just blaming it on the marketing department seems lazy and superficial, or perhaps for some it is deliberately ignoring the other side of things. And I can't say whose motivation is what on an individual level for most and certainly not for anyone here. Some well known personalities out there are easy to read because they tell you.