Another chapter in "We've Lost Our Freakin' Minds": Episode #31045 NCAA allows athletes to gamble on pro sports

  • Hi Guest, we are working on updating the site servers and software. We're also 'forcing' everyone to read and agree to our site privacy policy and terms of service. There are no significant changes to either of these but the terms page does clarify a few things that are mostly in the legalese. You can just click the checkbox for both and continue using the site as usual! We'll update you more on the site upgrades VERY soon! THANK YOU AS ALWAYS for supporting the site and being an active participant!

CB4

Hall of Fame
Aug 8, 2011
11,780
19,208
187
Birmingham, AL
That might apply to SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS, but we're talking the integrity of the damn game.

We have already had basketball point-shaving scandals at CCNY that went all over the country, Boston College (Henry Hill of "Goodfellas" fame), Tulane, and simultaneous b-ball and football scandals at Northwestern.

We've had at least one fixed World Series (probably more), Hall of Famers (or potential) suspended or banned from several sports, and several everyday players suspended.

And btw, this was just one month ago:

NCAA: 13 players from 6 schools involved in gambling schemes - ESPN
As pointed out in this most recent case, the players were providing inside info to third parties, betting on their own teams etc..

So in restricting them to betting on pro sports only, does this really “prevent” anything?

Let’s say I’m a starting on Acme University’s basketball team. But I spent the fall betting pro football and did poorly. So poorly that I’m $25k in the hole. Someone finds out (trust me people talk) and individual says he can make this problem go away by having you shave a few points in Acme U’s next game. And he can make it a little better for you if in the future you have team mates or friends on other teams that might want in on it.

Do you think the NBA was concerned about Charles Barkley and Michael Jordan losing millions in casinos? No not for them personally. They were concerned however about what losing that amount of money “might” lead them to do get even. I’ve been in the GA rooms long enough to simply say that many have no idea what gamblers will do to “catch up” . I’ve heard some crazy things that would blow your mind.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg

CB4

Hall of Fame
Aug 8, 2011
11,780
19,208
187
Birmingham, AL
1) Guy with NIL money bets on pro sports - good line of credit because he's rich
2) Guy gets in debt
3) Guy is offered chance to clear his debt, oh and he's the quarterback or a skill position player who handles the ball a lot.

In this case as CB4 noted above, we're not talking a mature 30-year-old.
Thank you. I just posted something similar right after you.
 

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
40,252
36,654
287
55
As pointed out in this most recent case, the players were providing inside info to third parties, betting on their own teams etc..

So in restricting them to betting on pro sports only, does this really “prevent” anything?

Let’s say I’m a starting on Acme University’s basketball team. But I spent the fall betting pro football and did poorly. So poorly that I’m $25k in the hole. Someone finds out (trust me people talk) and individual says he can make this problem go away by you shaving a few points in Acme U’s next game. And he can make it a little better for you if the future if you have team mates or friends on other teams that might want in on it.

Do you think the NBA was concerned about Charles Barkley and Michael Jordan losing millions in casinos? No not for them personally. They were concerned however about what losing that amount of money “might” lead them to do get even. I’ve been in the GA rooms long enough to simply say that many have no idea what gamblers will do to “catch up” . I’ve heard some crazy things that would blow your mind.
I always thought one of the biggest scandals - that MLB covered up at the time - was their umpires being put on what was apparently "double secret" probation at the same time they were banishing Pete Rose from the game.

March 8, 2002


Major league umpires Frank Pulli and Richie Garcia were placed on two years' probation in 1989 after a secret investigation into gambling on sports other than baseball. The New York Daily News said John Dowd, also the investigator in the Pete Rose gambling probe, wrote the report that led to the sanctions against the two umpires.

Fay Vincent, who was deputy commissioner and later commissioner in 1989, said that Don Zimmer -- then manager of the Chicago Cubs -- also was placed on probation in 1989 for betting on sports other than baseball. Zimmer discussed the sanction in a book published last year.

"These guys came in, they didn't deny it, it was no big deal," Vincent said. "That was it."

Vincent said the case was minor is his mind because there was no evidence of betting on baseball. Rose, the manager of the Cincinnati Reds, agreed to a lifetime ban that same year following an investigation into his gambling. While there was no official finding, commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti said he had concluded that Rose, the career hits leader, had bet on baseball.

Pulli and Garcia did not respond to attempts to reach them by the Daily News. Pulli did not return a telephone call Friday from The Associated Press seeking comment and Garcia could not be contacted. Pulli is entering his third season as an umpire supervisor and baseball is considering hiring Garcia as a supervisor.

Sandy Alderson, executive vice president of baseball operations in the commissioner's office, declined comment.

===================

But what is to stop the umpires - who have far bigger say in the outcome of a game than Pete Rose did - from having an Eric Gregg level strike zone to help a team win and help clear a debt? You know, it was at exactly this same time Tim Donaghy was rigging the outcome of the NBA playoffs.

Rich Garcia was the guy who thoroughly botched Game One of the 1996 ALCS, when he gave a home run to the Yankees when a 12-year-old kid interfered.

You think that doesn't look completely different when you find out the guy had been on probation for gambling?
 

NoNC4Tubs

Hall of Fame
Nov 13, 2010
10,010
6,043
187
Central Alabama
But what is to stop the umpires - who have far bigger say in the outcome of a game than Pete Rose did - from having an Eric Gregg level strike zone to help a team win and help clear a debt? You know, it was at exactly this same time Tim Donaghy was rigging the outcome of the NBA playoffs.

Rich Garcia was the guy who thoroughly botched Game One of the 1996 ALCS, when he gave a home run to the Yankees when a 12-year-old kid interfered.

You think that doesn't look completely different when you find out the guy had been on probation for gambling?
IMHO, I believe we saw indication of that in Knoxville three years ago with Jason Autrey......... :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtgreg