California professor flunks Kuwaiti's pro-U.S. essay

Oh well, I got a "C" in "American Indian" class at FSU and I'm Native. The Anthro professor had the audacity to ask me if I learned anything. Go figure! I guess I could have played the game and put down the answers that he as an "authority" wanted, but that just wouldn't be me.
 
For more on this topic, i.e. liberal professors hate their own country, read some Professor Mike Adams at townhall.com

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/archive.shtml

Example:

Shut up and teach!
Dear Professor Snider (csnider@csulb.edu):

Someone recently sent me a copy of the guidelines for a research paper that you require of your students at California State University, Long Beach. According to your website, the purpose of the paper is “to persuade or at least to create tolerance for your point of view on a controversial issue; also to acknowledge the opposing side of the issue.”

Below the basic requirements for the paper, you have listed a number of suggested “Subjects for an Argument Paper.” Below I have listed some of my favorite entries:

The Economy… Under President Clinton, the Federal Government had a handle on the national debt. Now the Bush administration is passing that debt on to the post-baby-boom generation…

George W. Bush's time in the National Guard presents important questions about the character of a man who has sent hundreds of Americans to their deaths in war and killed and maimed untold thousands of others…
 
I've always backed the right of little institutions like Foothill College and Prof. Woolcock to to teach any crapola they want. After all, we have religious colleges where the Holy Ghost is not mocked, and I suppose at MIT it's not PC to tell mad scientist jokes. But places like Foothill ought to label themselves accurately. Maybe "Che Guevera U." would alert Kuwaitis they are walking on thin ice. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads