Game Thread: CFP Playoff Game #1: #10 Indiana @ #7 Notre Dame (12/20 ABC 7p CT)

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
45,185
34,909
287
Vinings, ga., usa
so for those that wasted their valuable time by watching this garbage, were there actually a lot of people in the stands? or did espn cleverly rarely show the crowd so you cannot see the empty seats?
 

81usaf92

TideFans Legend
Apr 26, 2008
36,222
34,322
187
South Alabama
Like I alluded to earlier… the pick of SMU might have sunk CFB in year one of this iteration of the playoff, and it might have an immediate effect going forward. Because right now CFB’s 2nd biggest playoff matchup is going against a major NFL matchup in December. If I were to guess, Steelers vs Ravens competing for the AFC North championship in December is going to sink Texas vs Clemson 3 to 1 in viewership. So that leaves SMU vs PSU and Ohio State vs Tennessee to save a pretty bad lineup of 1st round games. Having Alabama in the playoffs today might have forced the NFL to flex the Steelers Ravens game to a different time slot to compete with the lesser game.
 

B1GTide

TideFans Legend
Apr 13, 2012
47,296
53,104
187
Looked packed to me. They said it was a sellout with tickets going over $1,000 between the 20’s.
Agreed - that stadium was packed, and the ND fans seemed to make a difference. Typical home field advantage.
 

B1GTide

TideFans Legend
Apr 13, 2012
47,296
53,104
187
Like I alluded to earlier… the pick of SMU might have sunk CFB in year one of this iteration of the playoff, and it might have an immediate effect going forward. Because right now CFB’s 2nd biggest playoff matchup is going against a major NFL matchup in December. If I were to guess, Steelers vs Ravens competing for the AFC North championship in December is going to sink Texas vs Clemson 3 to 1 in viewership. So that leaves SMU vs PSU and Ohio State vs Tennessee to save a pretty bad lineup of 1st round games. Having Alabama in the playoffs today might have forced the NFL to flex the Steelers Ravens game to a different time slot to compete with the lesser game.
The PSU game goes up against the Texans vs Chiefs. That game will also dominate the ratings.
 

81usaf92

TideFans Legend
Apr 26, 2008
36,222
34,322
187
South Alabama
The PSU game goes up against the Texans vs Chiefs. That game will also dominate the ratings.
I forgot about that one. I just remembered it was the Chiefs and somebody.

I also remember Josh Pate getting giddy about the prospect of CFB playoffs going against an NFL Saturday. He wanted it to force the NFL to allow CFB to move championships from Monday. But I’m like “Y’all are going against the best rivalry in the NFL and one of the must see national teams and think it’s going to make the NFL sweat?” Unless Alabama, Michigan,LSU, or Oklahoma are the teams then the NFL has nothing to worry
 

DzynKingRTR

TideFans Legend
Dec 17, 2003
45,185
34,909
287
Vinings, ga., usa
I forgot about that one. I just remembered it was the Chiefs and somebody.

I also remember Josh Pate getting giddy about the prospect of CFB playoffs going against an NFL Saturday. He wanted it to force the NFL to allow CFB to move championships from Monday. But I’m like “Y’all are going against the best rivalry in the NFL and one of the must see national teams and think it’s going to make the NFL sweat?” Unless Alabama, Michigan,LSU, or Oklahoma are the teams then the NFL has nothing to worry
Yeah, I know which games I will be watching.
 

RammerJammer15

All-American
Sep 9, 2012
3,520
2,204
187
Indiana got in on record alone and if you dared to bring up their weak schedule, you would be label as a SEC homer, Indiana would’ve barely been bowl eligible with Alabama’s schedule. They were closer to Army than Oregon, Texas, Ohio State, UGA, etc and should’ve been treated as such.

In this new super conference era, some teams will have weaker schedules than others and you’d think that the committee would’ve taken that into account with Indiana but they seem to be clueless, yeah they dominated the tomato cans but they got dominated by the only two good teams they played.
 

The Ols

Hall of Fame
Jul 8, 2012
5,369
6,157
187
Cumming,Ga.
Looked packed to me. They said it was a sellout with tickets going over $1,000 between the 20’s.
It was @ ND and both schools are under 100 miles apart. That one was going to sell.
The best part was the announcers…
Quote…”Well this game was a dud and it’s going to make people start asking if Indiana belonged.”
Then went on how the B1G was top heavy and IU played nobody…pretty much the same folks that were loving on Coach Google Me a week ago…
It is a joke and it won’t get better until they admit it…Pride is tough to swallow…
Indiana…c’mon…
 

Elefantman

Hall of Fame
Sep 18, 2007
6,347
4,651
187
R Can Saw
Th
I hope future committee members realize how absolutely retarded the 2024 iteration was. Maybe this will promote some change moving forward. Ideally, I don’t want the committee to exist at all, but that’s a pipe dream.
Like expanding the playoffs to 32 teams. That's what we need.
 

day-day

Hall of Fame
Jan 2, 2005
10,612
2,350
187
Bartlett, TN (Memphis area)
Notre Dame appears to have a pretty good defense
I have to agree with most of this, except maybe the sentence after the first paragraph:
I agree with this statement:
In reality, four teams was often too many. We could have expanded to six teams and kept some semblance of respectability. There have been years when five or six teams deserved a shot with last season being a prime example.
I think buy-in from all teams pushed it to the 12-team number and getting automatic berths from conference champions. An 8-team playoff with automatic conference spots might still bump out a team or two that should be in it.
 

KrAzY3

Hall of Fame
Jan 18, 2006
10,873
5,284
187
44
kraizy.art
I was pointing out the fact that Oklahoma only lost to good teams before they beat Alabama (wasn't expecting that though). Oklahoma actually has a very highly rated team in terms of recruits, they're loaded with talent, obviously underachieving and not especially well coached. Having said that, they were the #3 team in the Big 12 last year and without Texas there, they'd have had a good chance of winning the Big 12 this year had they stayed.

A lot of people want to pretend all power conference games are equal (the Big 12 isn't even a power conference anymore and the SEC isn't either, they're a super conference), while pretending all power conferences games have some magical property to them over non-power conference games.

Army with one loss? #22 team. Indiana with 1 loss? #8 team. SMU with 2 losses last year? #22 team. SMU with 2 losses this year? #10. I don't think they even want to know how to evaluate a team on the merits.

They won't look at SoS, they don't care about the actual quality of opponents, just power conference yes or no, then wins and losses. I guess that's what happens when you get someone to stop covering dog shows and the WNBA long enough to be on the committee.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gtgilbert

TideFans.shop - 12/21 25-30% OFF !!

TideFans.shop 25% off sitewide!! TideFansShop.com : up to 30% Off Sitewide!

TideFans.shop - Get YOUR Bama Gear HERE!

TideFans.shop

Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads