Exactly what I was thinking. We wouldn’t have done that with the previous admin. It showed we were changing.
Also, all of the comments are predictably more “offensive” plays. It is very hard to identify all the great defensive calls he certainly made that changed games/momentum. That is harder to see.
Along those lines, I remember a championship game -- don't remember whether it was SEC or BCS. But early on, our D was getting gashed on the ground. Saban made an in-game call to scrap the plan and change the way the D was lining up. I'm guessing that also involved tweaking personnel to guys that better fit the adjustment. To your point about not identifying in-game defensive calls, I also don't remember what the change was -- 3-4 to 4-3? Vice versa? Something else? I'm not sure.
We started getting stops and eventually won the game. I just remember Saban talking about it after the win. He obviously didn't couch it as a great adjustment. He just said that the original plan clearly wasn't working, so he had no choice but to change.
It is, however, example #958,679,874 of how the great coaches adjust -- both in-game and over time. It's what made Saban and Bryant the GOATs.
Good coaches get really good at one approach and execute it better than most. You can win a lot with that approach....for a while anyway. But they tend to lose track of the fact that the game, rules, and on-field interpretation of existing rules all evolve.
Past success tends to put blinders on the coach who is good but not great. He thinks, "This is how we play. We've been successful. There is no reason to change, and I'm not going to chase trends." Criticism of an outdated philosophy offends their ego and only makes them dig in deeper with a bunker mentality.
Look no further than Stallings or Les Miles to see the good-but-not-great behavior and its attendant limitations -- both short-term and long-term.