Okay, since we're on this topic ... was anyone else besides me taken aback by Keith Brown's attitude in the post-game radio interview Saturday?
He was asked something about whether the team had a lack of focus on the ULM game ... and his answer was basically to recite his statistics for the game (x catches, x yards) and dismiss the question.
Don't want to be overly-critical, but it rubbed me the wrong way.
What specifically is your problem with it?
Does anyone have a transcript of exactly what he said? I remember the comment but not the context of the question by Eli that led to the answer. It didn't strike me as a bad answer at the time....he seemed a bit shell-shocked during the interview but I can't quite recall all of it.
What specifically is your problem with it?
Maybe he was one of the guys who got ready to play and was disgusted with the ones who weren't.
Nothing specific, i just wasn't fond of it. Maybe my take on it is wrong. What is your take on it?
I personally thought it was the best quote of the whole press conference.
It's proof of Saban's vision of leadership. He doesn't have to have 100 18-22 year-olds on board with it (or a bunch of hard-to-please fans, or a bunch of quote-seeking media members) to be correct. And he doesn't have to beat a mediocre Sun Belt school to prove he can coach.
right things + right way = long term success
"I'm not going to sugarcoat it," he (Saban) said. "If we can't win doing it the right way, then I won't be here. That's not going to happen."
"I'm not going to sugarcoat it," he said. "If we can't win doing it the right way, then I won't be here. That's not going to happen."
I wasn't too fond of this remark.
Maybe he was one of the guys who got ready to play and was disgusted with the ones who weren't.
About the only two senoirs I hate to see leave this year is Wallace Gilberry and Darren Mustin! A walk on and a last second find by Shula who didn't have a D-1 scholly!! The juniors had better get IT, by next fall or we are going to be the youngest starting team in the nation, in my opinion!
Nothing specific, i just wasn't fond of it. Maybe my take on it is wrong. What is your take on it?
What I took from it was that he would be gone if he couldn't win and do it the right way, which I took to mean without 12 suspensions in a season. Then he immediately said that he didn't see that happening (his failing to win). I think you really have to torture his language to twist it into a threat. It sounded like a pronouncement of determination to me. But, then, I don't have an essentially negative attitude towards him, as you do, judging from your posts, so I"m not parsing his every word for something to criticize...