Dabo has been average at best since Venables left...
That's a really good point, and gets to my way of viewing a coach and their success. I'm not calling for DeBoer to be fired, but I am saying look this lack of a running game (which I've talked about for over a year) is a serious issue and only staff changes can address it.
If DeBoer goes out and makes those changes, develops a legit running game, and then has a lot of success next year I will not say "oh it's just because he hired so and so". No, I will give him credit because he made the right hires.
Success to me is the measuring stick of a coach. Dabo hired Venables and kept him around long enough to win two titles. Good on both of them. Clemson had 1 title before that, now they have 3. If I'm a Clemson fan Dabo has my eternal gratitude for doing that.
But! You can't coast on previous performances forever, anymore than DeBoer's very impressive 14-1 Washington team (with Penix if we're pointing out who had help) can carry him forever.
So yeah, credit where credit is due. Credit for Dabo winning with Venables, credit to DeBoer winning with Penix, but their job is to win now as well. And for the record I hope Dabo keeps losing and DeBoer finds a way to elevate the program. Some people have reason to believe staff changes are coming so I do remain hopeful (and will keep checking this thread, heh).