Dabo defending himself and Clempson

uafan4life

Hall of Fame
Mar 30, 2001
16,506
8,729
287
44
Florence, AL
My bold preseason prediction of Clempson losing at least four games this season isn't looking so bold, now.

I have zero respect for Dabo Whiney, for some reasons that are obvious and some reasons I won't go into here, and this path is one I've been predicting for years at this point.

At this point, regardless of the odds, I wouldn't put money on Dabo winning another championship - of any type - in the top tier of college football...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dathbama

colbysullivan

Hall of Fame
Dec 12, 2007
19,810
21,555
187
Gulf Breeze, FL
My bold preseason prediction of Clempson losing at least four games this season isn't looking so bold, now.

I have zero respect for Dabo Whiney, for some reasons that are obvious and some reasons I won't go into here, and this path is one I've been predicting for years at this point.

At this point, regardless of the odds, I wouldn't put money on Dabo winning another championship - of any type - in the top tier of college football...
Good thing you qualified it with “at least” lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: uafan4life

TideMan09

Hall of Fame
Jan 17, 2009
12,490
1,857
187
Anniston, Alabama
When Clemson runs down the hill before home games, I have a suggestion for them, they should play the Benny Hill theme song..

It's perfect for how Dabo is coaching & the way they're playing football..
 

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
40,007
36,111
287
55
Can I make the one point about "I suspect Dabo might be skirting the rules"?

That MAY be true. I'm hesitant in every case to accuse anyone of that because I think it's an easy way out, particularly when the dollar bills don't pass the ball, don't make the tackles, and don't block the opposing line. I think it's an easy way to discredit accomplishment, something along the lines of "you know, Belichick never won anything without Brady," as if therefore "but Belichick DRAFTED Brady" doesn't matter.

The ACC turned out to be, well, not very good, but he still had to beat the non-conference opponents. Besides, we know for a fact Auburn paid some guys, including Eric Ramsey (for which they got probation) and Cam Newton. And they were credibly accused of same by a dozen other players through the years who had no proof.

But if winning is as simple as "but he pays players," how do you explain Ole Miss never winning so much as an SEC championship? Pruitt did it, Tennessee didn't win anything. Jimbo Fisher went out and literally bought a roster at aTm and didn't win anything as well. I can name more teams that DID NOT win national championships and won about what they would have without paid players than you can name teams that DID win with "bought players."

Even Ryan Day's bought and paid for $20 million roster at Ohio State would not have won a national title last year without the expanded playoff.

My point is this: even if Dabo DID skirt the rules to pay players, the coaching, the game plan, and staff, and the execution STILL MATTER to a greater degree than "we gave Sunshine a million bucks to play for us."

It's also possible that what works in the ACC doesn't work at all in the SEC, too. Look no further than Jimbo Fisher (national championship) or Bobby Petrino (who wasn't half bad given he was at Arkansas) for examples.
 

arthurdawg

1st Team
Sep 11, 2024
645
1,212
167
Can I make the one point about "I suspect Dabo might be skirting the rules"?

That MAY be true. I'm hesitant in every case to accuse anyone of that because I think it's an easy way out, particularly when the dollar bills don't pass the ball, don't make the tackles, and don't block the opposing line. I think it's an easy way to discredit accomplishment, something along the lines of "you know, Belichick never won anything without Brady," as if therefore "but Belichick DRAFTED Brady" doesn't matter.

The ACC turned out to be, well, not very good, but he still had to beat the non-conference opponents. Besides, we know for a fact Auburn paid some guys, including Eric Ramsey (for which they got probation) and Cam Newton. And they were credibly accused of same by a dozen other players through the years who had no proof.

But if winning is as simple as "but he pays players," how do you explain Ole Miss never winning so much as an SEC championship? Pruitt did it, Tennessee didn't win anything. Jimbo Fisher went out and literally bought a roster at aTm and didn't win anything as well. I can name more teams that DID NOT win national championships and won about what they would have without paid players than you can name teams that DID win with "bought players."

Even Ryan Day's bought and paid for $20 million roster at Ohio State would not have won a national title last year without the expanded playoff.

My point is this: even if Dabo DID skirt the rules to pay players, the coaching, the game plan, and staff, and the execution STILL MATTER to a greater degree than "we gave Sunshine a million bucks to play for us."

It's also possible that what works in the ACC doesn't work at all in the SEC, too. Look no further than Jimbo Fisher (national championship) or Bobby Petrino (who wasn't half bad given he was at Arkansas) for examples.
You still have to coach the team up. We all point to Cam Newton, but they also won because they had Dirty Cheap Shot Fairley on the DL creating havoc and a few other players. They were surrounded by a huge crop of 20+ seniors who had all played a good bit and knew their assignments and were bough in, even though their talents were average.
 

New Posts

|

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - Get your Gear HERE!

Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light
Alabama Crimson Tide Car Door Light

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.