I actually agree with the man that this philosophy does work and I agree with what he says about why it works. Sometimes I think we get caught up in thinking that the argument/issue is between HUNH vs no HUNH and is it "right" or "wrong" to use it. It's not. HUNH exists, it is legal, and teams employ it. Period. If they regulate it, fine. But until then, the sole question is how do you stop it.The best way I have noticed to defend HUNH is to do one of 2 things on defense - 1) create a negative yardage play on first down or 2) force incomplete passes. Either one of the 2 disrupts the timing of the offense and forces more huddles. A lot of HUNH is a series of script play calling that must be disrupted.
Here is the most complete description of exactly what is happening in a HUNH offense.
It is an interesting but puturbing read. HUNH offenses exploit every rule in the book that shows you just how much the offense is favored in the game. Sickening really. The writer openly suggests the tempo could be dangerous to defensive players who are not used to playing against it. In reading, I dont see one effective tool the defense can employ to stop when run properly because it is a rule book offense not player on player.
After reading this I cant see why we havent seen more vocal requests for rule changes by defensive minded teams or the NFL. Seriously you cant run this offense long term in the NFL with only a 54 man roster.
Like I have said before if you to see football turn into lacrosse there ought to be some rule changes to balance the inequity because this strategy is hijacking football.
First off, you need a plan. Probably a 8-10 man rotation of DBs with a system for rotating the "friendly-side" corner and nickel so they alternate positions to avoid being run to death as the author describes. You need to really disguise your man/zone looks as well as disguise zone blitzes/man blitzes. Jamming the inside WRs is an absolute must.
I also adamantly believe that you must attack aggressiveness with aggressiveness. You cannot sit back in coverage and allow plays to develop. This offense runs too much misdirection and too many drag/crossing routes. You'll give up 1st downs and you'll lose. I think you need to blitz the daylights out of them and hope you get more stops than you give up big plays. Then your offense needs to be exactly what we have--the ability to pound you into submission and beat you over the top. It's a difficult task and it tests a defense's ability to properly plan and execute for 60 minutes and you'll have to just live with some level of success by the offense but if you win the battle early then the offensive scheme starts to turn in on itself.