ESPN Rankings...VERY ODD!

The other thing was 14 of the top 15 schedules were SEC schools. The only exception was tOSU.
More telling is that every SEC school is in the top 20 vs 4 in all other leagues combined.

We have the strongest, most competitive league which is what you want as a SEC fan. As such, unfortunately, there is no apples to apples comparison to the rest of the leagues no matter what formula one uses in trying to bridge the gap in a championship model. Just don't see anyone in the SEC winning a NC in this environment.
 
This is the most unclear I have felt going into a season in a long time. We are relying on a lot of transfers , esp on the offensive line. Not to mention a QB with virtually no SEC experience. Beyond the DBs, the defense has so many unknowns. And not to stir the pot, but our coach is still unproven ( as far as at Bama).

I literally have no clue if we’re a playoff team or a fringe Top 25.
 
Sankey acquiesced to the 9 game conference schedule to keep up revenue wise with the Big 10 moreso than continued post season dominance. I suspect he didn't make that decision without consulting the conference presidents and ADs. I also suspect they all went along with it because the outside NIL opportunities for many of the conference teams was not as deep as the Big 10.

I think he believed the improved parity within the conference would garner more eyeballs and more revenue in the long run. The problem is the SEC is playing a conference and postseason slate of games that is easily 2x more difficult than the Big 10...
You are probably right, but the ESPN strength of schedule ranking are telling.
 
So, this year, like in the past ESPN has come out with their preseason rankings. I'll pull the band aid off now and just say they have us at #8. Better than I anticipated. However, that's not the reason I'm posting this: I'm posting this because their projections and rankings contradict each other. See below and please tell me how this is possible.

Somebody is going to have to explain to me how a team with 9.8 projected wins can be ranked higher than teams with 10.7 and 10.2 projected wins. I'm not a fan of either Texas or Notre Dame (OBVIOUSLY), but in terms of ESPN's rankings, they have Notre Dame projected to win 10.7 games and yet have both Texas (9.8 wins and Ohio State 10.2 wins) ranked above them. That is odd and mathematically makes NO SENSE! Frankly, Texas Tech has the highest win total of any team on the board at 10.8 but is ranked 10th. Now granted it's Texas Tech and their schedule has to have an effect on this, but most of the others are very odd. Also, I would have expected Texas Tech, who now doesn't have a QB to have fallen out of the top 10, but they believe that their run game will save them. Forgive me, but we are talking about the Big 12...a league that throws the ball on every play and doesn't play defense, yet a run game is supposed to save TT's season. Anyway, I digress, please explain ESPN's rankings.

Oh, by the way, they project Bama to win 8.6 games! If DeBoer doesn't want to be on the hottest seat in football heading into season 4, he may want to win more than 8.6 games or ____ will be cooler than his seat.
Coach Stallings said it best, "Alabama fans expect excellence. What's wrong from that?" MY MY have things have changed and not for the better. It starts in the AD office.
 

New Posts

Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads