I won't argue that Miami was a waning "dynasty" when we faced them on Jan 1, 1993. And I use the word dynasty in the loosest of terms.
In hindsight, Selma has all the critical points nailed down. The "experts" should have seen it. That Miami was so heavily favored proves that Vegas is not always so smart. Miami could not run the ball to save its life. Toretta was not Dan Marino. Miami's defense was great, but they were soft up the middle. If I recall correctly, Alabama did most of its damage running the ball between the tackles.
It may have been a narrow path to that that blowout score, but that 1992 team was the perfect team for said path. So I think uafan makes some great points as well. Although I don't think either of you are dismissing the other.
In hindsight, Selma has all the critical points nailed down. The "experts" should have seen it. That Miami was so heavily favored proves that Vegas is not always so smart. Miami could not run the ball to save its life. Toretta was not Dan Marino. Miami's defense was great, but they were soft up the middle. If I recall correctly, Alabama did most of its damage running the ball between the tackles.
It may have been a narrow path to that that blowout score, but that 1992 team was the perfect team for said path. So I think uafan makes some great points as well. Although I don't think either of you are dismissing the other.