Getting a LITTLE concerned with Ole Miss..

TiderinMiss

Hall of Fame
Oct 2, 2000
10,163
17
0
56
Clinton, MS
Orgeron does know defense, and he fielded a pretty good one today, albeit it was Memphis.

Still, I think our offensive line needs to be ready if we're going to get thme again in Oxford.

Here's a depressing stat: We haven't beaten Ole Miss in Oxford since 1999.
 

TENNTIDE1

1st Team
Nov 14, 1999
430
60
147
Bartlett, Tn. U.S.A.
I'm concerned with every team on our schedule. The Ole Miss defense looked pretty good, but I think an inept Memphis offense made them look even better.

Memphis was starting an inexperienced QB that was out of the game by the third play and the back-up QB had never been in a game. Ole Miss did take away the Memphis running game and with no passing game to speak of, Memphis still had a chance to beat Ole Miss on their last drive.

Memphis does not have the athletes to run a Joe Lee Dunn defense effectively. Ole Miss had an effective offense and Spurlock did a good job running it. I still don't know how good Memphis is.

Orgeron will have his kids motivated and prepared. Either way, our coaching staff can't overlook Ole Miss or anyone else for that matter.
 

Crimsonkid

New Member
Aug 8, 2005
6
0
0
39
Yeah we shouldn't look pass Ole Miss but it was Memphis! Eventhough, I like Memphis alot but they had to replace 4 men on the O-line lost 4 of their top 5 recievers and everyone knows D'Angelo is gonna get the ball majority of the time. Memphis could of won the game but the RS Freshman QB having to come in really hurt the tigers bad. I still believe we will walk into Oxford and get the Win.
 

cbfactor

Scout Team
Feb 12, 2004
153
0
0
A C-USA offense should not look very good against any respectable SEC opponent. Don' forget that Memphis drove some 40 yards in the last 2 minutes to have a shot at winning it. The back up QB for Memphis made a poor decision that sealed it. Sorry I just don't see Ole Misses D providing to many problems for us.
 

Alanbama27

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
4,629
35
67
63
Hoover, Alabama, USA
While the Lil' Sis defense was good, it is blatantly apparant yet again

that Spurlock couldn't hit the broad side of a barn from 20 feet throwing the ball. Yes, he's got wheels, but he missed WIDE OPEN receivers all day long. Until he learns how to throw a ball, I'm not going to be too scared of them. I think our match up with them favors Bama by a long shot.
 

mikeua69

All-American
Apr 16, 2002
2,717
127
182
Alabaster, AL
I agree Alan, the Ole Miss offense looked exactly the same as last years. Yes the defense was much improved, but they have some problems at QB.
 

trenda

Hall of Fame
May 17, 2000
6,496
213
187
56
Hendersonville, TN USA
The one thing that impressed me out of Ole Miss yesterday was the fact that Noel Mazzone obviously realized (where Cutcliffe didn't) that Spurlock is a much better passer rolling out than standing in the pocket. When OM rolled Spurlock out, he was pretty dead-on with his passes. He struggled mightly throwing from inside the pocket.

As far as defense goes, aside from bottling Williams up, what did OM do on defense?

This was the situation: everyone in the world knew that Williams was/is the key to Memphis' offense this season. After the starting QB went down on the third play of their first series, the Tigers were forced to play with a redshirt freshman QB who doesn't even completely know the offense (sound familiar????). Tommy West said after the game that they were forced to only be able to use part of their offensive gameplan against Ole Miss because Hudgens simply didn't know the whole gameplan (he hadn't received the reps necessary to execute it). Memphis employees a no-huddle offense and the QB looks to the sideline while at the line of scrimmage to get the play-call from the staff. There were times where he completely misread their calls and put Memphis in the wrong play - ie, running to the opposite side of where the staff wanted the play to go. Memphis lost four starters on the OL from last season, their QB and 4 of their top 5 WRs. All of this, and with the game on the line, Memphis marched right down the field in less than a minute and were poised to score when the redshirt freshman QB - who hadn't even figured to play in this game - made a poor choice and a poor throw that was intercepted in the endzone. I truly believe that if Memphis had just put the ball in Williams hands (via handoff or pass), the Tigers would have scored and won the game.

Memphis was actually even considering playing Maurice Avery - one of their top receivers - as their 2nd QB. That's how unsure they were about Hudgens. And this guy looked like a veteran against Ole Miss' defense.

The Ole Miss defensive gameplan (by their own admission) was to completely key on Williams and make the rest of the team beat them. Well, with 11 guys keying on him, a QB making the wrong play calls at the line of scrimmage, and an OL that is below average at best (Williams was getting hit as soon as he got the ball in the backfield), Williams still managed to gain 85 yards and had around 20 yards receiving.

I just was not impressed with the Ole Miss defense yesterday. Personally, I was more impressed with Spurlock's ability to throw on those rollouts than I was with their defense.
 

Love the Ping

All-SEC
Jun 15, 2005
1,469
0
0
43
TiderinMiss said:
Here's a depressing stat: We haven't beaten Ole Miss in Oxford since 1999.
When you say we have lost our last two trips to Ole Miss it doesn't sound quite as bad.

That offense will struggle to score on our defense, remember, Memphis was downright pitiful on defense last year and Ole Miss wasn't really lighting up the scoreboard yesterday.

Also, remember that a second string QB was in there for Memphis and he really couldn't do anything, so OM stacked the box and didn't allow Williams running room. I don't think they could use this tactic successfully against us even if JPW was in at QB.

OM will be improved from last year, IMO, but is still not a very good football team.
 

ajacks04

3rd Team
Jul 15, 2004
201
0
0
okay, were talking about two games here. in 2001, fraud's first year, we had an atrocious defense. remember hirchel bolden? in 03, shula's first year, we again had a bad defense and they had eli. so there are 3 things that i see that result in a loss to ole miss.
1. a first year coach regime
2. a bad defense
3. eli at QB

i see none of those in this years matchup. bama will handle ole sis.
 

New Posts

Latest threads