The fact that we still dumb the revolution down to “what happened in Boston” is still amazing.
In the Semiquincentennial thread, I posted Parliament's proposal to tax the colonies through their own legislatures and only so far as to pay the salaries of royal customs collectors and soldiers needed to defend the empire.. A proposal the colonists rejected,The fact that we still dumb the revolution down to “what happened in Boston” is still amazing.
Well you also have the Proclamation line issue.In the Semiquincentennial thread, I posted Parliament's proposal to tax the colonies through their own legislatures and only so far as to pay the salaries of royal customs collectors and soldiers needed to defend the empire.. A proposal the colonists rejected,
Like many wars, there were multiple causes.
Agreed. That was what I was referring to here:Well you also have the Proclamation line issue.
In the settlement of the Seven Years' War, the Crown had drawn a line along the western frontier and guaranteed the Indians there that British subjects would not attempt to settle west of that line. A lot of colonial leaders had already purchased land west of that line (as an investment) and were thus defrauded (in their view) by the Crown.
but apart from that, what have the Brit’s ever done for us /sThe Brits gave us a bicameral legislature
The idea of a Bill of Rights
The English Common Law
And (by negative example) the need for a written constitution.
Not bad.
one of my favorite memes
My point is more that in general we tend to base everything on “taxation without representation”, “we are tired of kings”, and “everything that happened to Boston”, but the fact is that it was far more complex than what we make it out to be. Also much of what the British did before the Revolution is far more rational than what we make it out to be.Agreed. That was what I was referring to here:
They're fine with Trump nannying them so long as Trump oppresses the people they think should be oppressed.What I don't understand is the cognitive dissonance of the "Don't Tread On Me" crowd and the desire to elect the Dear Leader to Nanny them forever and ever.
To be fair, do you think fourth and fifth graders will understand all that other stuff? The history has been dumbed down because they are teaching it at such a young age. Taxation without representations sounds cool. All that other stuff...not so much.My point is more that in general we tend to base everything on “taxation without representation”, “we are tired of kings”, and “everything that happened to Boston”, but the fact is that it was far more complex than what we make it out to be. Also much of what the British did before the Revolution is far more rational than what we make it out to be.
If we had pressed forward with the "turtle," the one-man submersible, it might have had great impact on the fleet. The first attempt failed only because the pilot couldn't attach the bomb to the bottom of the ship. An idea way ahead of its time...Happy Secession Day everybody.
A British historian's take.
Forgive the goofy football stuff in the video, but Dr. Ferreiro is correct: the arrival of the French navy in American waters was a game changer. The British no longer had unchallenged control of the seas.
TBF Woodrow Wilson thought changing the history curriculum to the south politically fighting for States Rights sounds cooler than slavery too….To be fair, do you think fourth and fifth graders will understand all that other stuff? The history has been dumbed down because they are teaching it at such a young age. Taxation without representations sounds cool. All that other stuff...not so much.