F fosterkeats Banned Aug 25, 2002 501 8 0 Atlanta, GA www.thenation.com Apr 19, 2004 #21 <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by NOSty: Still no liberals to answer my question, eh?</font> Click to expand... It doesn't matter... by November, Bush will be a dead man walking... Iraq will cost the Bush family 2 re-elections... can't wait!!!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by NOSty: Still no liberals to answer my question, eh?</font> Click to expand... It doesn't matter... by November, Bush will be a dead man walking... Iraq will cost the Bush family 2 re-elections... can't wait!!!
B Bamalaw92 Banned Dec 11, 2003 2,120 45 0 Montgomery Apr 19, 2004 #22 <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by fosterkeats: It doesn't matter... by November, Bush will be a dead man walking... Iraq will cost the Bush family 2 re-elections... can't wait!!!</font> Click to expand... Iraq did not cost Bush I a re-election and will not cost Bush II a re-election. In the now famous words of James Carville. "It's the economy stupid!" If the election was held on the sole issue of Iraq, both bushes win re-election and win VERY big.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by fosterkeats: It doesn't matter... by November, Bush will be a dead man walking... Iraq will cost the Bush family 2 re-elections... can't wait!!!</font> Click to expand... Iraq did not cost Bush I a re-election and will not cost Bush II a re-election. In the now famous words of James Carville. "It's the economy stupid!" If the election was held on the sole issue of Iraq, both bushes win re-election and win VERY big.