Being a life long Bama fan in my 70s. Having read the thread, while trying to keep an open mind, my response is still “Not NO but heck NO”. RTR
The only reason to add a school to the league is if that school brings in more incremental revenue (from added eyeballs) for each existing member than each existing member loses from dilution to the new member's share. That's why SMU had to agree to no ACC share for several years - they bring close to zero incremental eyeballs. If you want to be revenue positive for each existing member in year 1, the list of programs outside the B1G that make sense -- brand strength in at least one of the two major revenue sports, and enough new eyeballs -- is short:I'd rather bring Georgia Tech and Tulane back to the SEC than have Notre Dame
The only reason they even have a loose association with the ACC is basketball and baseball has a requirement of a conference. There are no independent teams allowed. In football they allow it, unless you are a small school moving to FBS. You have to have an invite to a conference before they allow it.Would still make more sense than Notre Dame
We already have one boujee blue blood in Texas but at least they’re in the south and we already have a midwestern school in Mizzou. ND adds nothing to the SEC.
I don’t see them joining a conference anyway, they want to have their cake and eat it too by being loosely affiliated with a conference and having the NBC deal.
That would be the only direction the SEC would go in, IMO.If the discussion is about SEC expansion, I selfishly want to add some combination of NC, Duke, Virginia or Virginia Tech OR even N.C. State.
What considerations did the shorthorns get from the SEC?While I doubt ND would join the SEC (but never say never; see next paragraph), I'd enthusiastically support it provided ND joined under the terms similar to those for UTw. The Horns got some additional, but still relatively minor, consideration because of the value of their brand to the conference (buyout/wind-down of Longhorn Network; full share on Day 1; premium brand placement). If ND would accept proportional terms, it would be a good deal for the league. A game every few years at South Bend would be fine with me; bonus if it's later in the season; the Grotto at night in the snow is worth it.
As for ND and the B1G, in the current financial environment I would never say they would never do it, but it's difficult to overstate the disdain most ND alums and fans have for that conference. Their collective memory is of a cabal of schools that refused to play ND for the sole reason that ND was Catholic Could that be overcome? Yes. Would it be easy? No.
The answer to your question was in the quoted post, but here it is again (emphasis added): "...The Horns got some additional, but still relatively minor, consideration because of the value of their brand to the conference (buyout/wind-down of Longhorn Network; full share on Day 1; premium brand placement)...."What considerations did the shorthorns get from the SEC?![]()
All respect, but I’ve love some of whatever you’re on.Consider, if you will…
a giant orange pucker-hole located in Austin, Texas which errantly claims superiority over everything within its orbit…meeting an equally, all-consuming golden-clad pucker-hole in South Bend, Indiana…which has aMASSed an equal amount of Ego-MASS whilst avoiding any form of Conferrence…
…meeting within a singular shared space of existence.
Everything existing within the space between the two would cease to exist…being ripped apart from the twin-kinetic forces fighting for SEC (Super-Ego-Control) dominance!!!
All respect, but I’ve love some of whatever you’re on.
It’s totally 100% grade-A product mined from the depths of my insanely-sane and linearly-twisted mindAll respect, but I’ve love some of whatever you’re on.