I don't know how many of you saw the end of the Sooners game this weekend, but Oklahoma was called for pass interference call where the ball was tipped. The play was challenged, and the announcers of the game were saying that instant replay could be used to determine if the ball was tipped or not. If the ball was tipped, then there could be no pass interference. The refs reviewed it, but (incorrectly) did not overturn the call.
This really surprised me because I did not realize that this was something that could be reviewed. If it is true, I think it is inconsitant that a team can challenge one particular aspect of pass interference, but not everything about it. I do think pass interference should be reviewable because it is the call that the refs miss most often, but all of it should be reviewable or none of it should.
Also, if instant replay can be used to determine if the ball was tipped, it makes the Auburn-LSU refs look even more foolish. The refs knew that it was a close play because they originally threw a flag and then picked it up. That should have definitely been reviewed.
This really surprised me because I did not realize that this was something that could be reviewed. If it is true, I think it is inconsitant that a team can challenge one particular aspect of pass interference, but not everything about it. I do think pass interference should be reviewable because it is the call that the refs miss most often, but all of it should be reviewable or none of it should.
Also, if instant replay can be used to determine if the ball was tipped, it makes the Auburn-LSU refs look even more foolish. The refs knew that it was a close play because they originally threw a flag and then picked it up. That should have definitely been reviewed.