Waiting for
@selmaborntidefan to tap his sign of "Auburn is historically an average program, mixed with a small amount of highest of highs and lowest of lows...".
I remember the smirks and snickers FROM AUBURN in 1998 when they chuckled at Ole Miss reacting like a scorned lover when Senator Wingnut left Oxford OUTSIDE of a pine box. But they said - and at the time rightly so - that Ole Miss was not anything but a mid-level college program whose glory days were long gone and they cleave to that like their 1958-1962 all-white football teams represent their value and ranking historically.
My how the tables have turned. Ole Miss is now a substantially better job than Opelika Tech.
Just eyeballing it (without deep analysis), Auburn ranks:
#13 in wins (I'm excluding the Ivy League teams and Wittenberg)
#19 in winning percentage (again - excluding the piles of lower level garbage)
#5 in SEC championships (8)
#6 in Heisman Trophy winners (the five ahead of them are blue bloods)
That's NOT a bad overall record for a non-Blue Blood. The problem for Auburn is that Alabama, Tennessee, LSU, and Georgia all rank ahead of them and play in the same conference. And while HISTORICALLY Florida would be ranked a tiny bit behind Auburn (43-39 Auburn leads it, a few more wins, a slightly higher pct), a comparison of the two programs since 1991 wouldn't even be all that close. (And I'm not counting Texas and OU at this point - but throw them in and Auburn might be about the 8th best coaching job in the SEC.
Auburn was never a good job - except when Alabama was in transition or on probation.
Auburn isn't the only school to overstate their status in college football, and they won't be the last. But they could save themselves a lot of headache to worry about themselves more than being envious of Alabama.
Years ago - before Dabo had his great five-year run - Stewart Mandel
coined a term to describe teams you're talking about, calling it Clemson-Ole Miss Syndrome. It is the idea that the PEAK OF A PROGRAM over a short period of time represents where that team stands HISTORICALLY FOR ALL-TIME. And Mandel was using that term when Clemson kept pointing back to their lone title in 1981 as proof they were a big deal. Same thing with Ole Miss, who all through the 70s and 80s and into the 90s when I was living in Mississippi never stopped bringing up Archie Manning like he was the current NCAA passing leader. Keep in mind that after meeting us in the snowy New Orleans Sugar Bowl on January 1, 1964, Ole Miss only played in
ONE big New Year's Day bowl game from that era over the next 40 years. They DID play in a pair of Gator Bowls (1971, 1991), but that was always a second-tier bowl game and not among the big money payouts or prestigious.
For 40 years, they didn't play in one bowl game that meant anything except to them. And even then - they only played in the Cotton Bowl because of the BCS. They were still no better than #3 in the SEC, maybe #4.