I'm not angry, upset, outraged, or ticked off. I respect Jess' opinion and that is what it is, an opinion based on analysis and study of personnel on both sides.
That being said, I respectfully disagree with LSU winning this one.
1. One team has a legit Heisman candidate - That would be us, Richardson.
2. One team has three players on the Lombardi award list - That would be us, Hightower, BJ, and Upshaw. LSU has zero.
3. One team has two on the Outland trophy watch list - That would be us, BJ and Vlachos. LSU has zero.
If LSU has this overpowering, super power d-line, where are the accolades? Why aren't their team stats on defense against rushing #1 in the nation? Why don't they lead the nation in sacks? Who have they played that has a o-line like ours?
4. One team has two players on the Butkus award list - That would be us, Hightower and Upshaw. LSU has zero.
Hightower and Upshaw are hybrid linebackers and DE. So, you can count their skill sets for both LB and DL. They both at times will put a hand down and add that quick DL component to the line. When you add their talents to the DL who wins the DL rating? Answer = Bama.
5. One team has two players on the Jim Thorpe award list - That would be us, Kirkpatrick and Barron. LSU has one, Claiborne.
In matching up personnel, it is my opinion that both sides of our line win the game in the trenches. Richardson and his buddies will stomp a mudhole in much of the LSU vaunted defense. LSU will get hit in the mouth and do like I've seen LSU do a number of times over the past few years, when they get matched against a bigger badder bully they start getting injured and are dragged off the field in regular intervals in the second half.
I do think we have a home field advantage. The noise that is going to be produced at this game will effect the best of QB's and will be a factor.
Our team will be more angry, upset, outraged, ticked off, motivated and talented than LSU. Bama wins this one.