I agree with those on here who think that "breakout year" is an inappropriate phrase concerning Marcel Dareus.
There are many things that I would change about ESPN if I had my fantasy-druthers, and this is a perfect example. It is this practice of scanning the college football teams during the offseason, without really honing in on any one team, happening up, usually obliquely, on this or that outstanding feature, and trying to make some comparison or summary, mainly just to have something to write about when there really isn't that much to write about.
I think that the basis for this sort of thing is simply a failure to actually do their homework. The modern sports press, of which ESPN is the 'outstanding' eample, seems to be infected with the myth that they are so charismatic on camera and therefore in print that the mere fact that they express themselves is reason enough to make this or that statement.
If you are as obsessive about your team as I am, then such popping off as this is aggravating. You see your guy's name in print, and the idea ESPN is putting forth is that they are praising your player, when actually they are discounting what your player actually did. In this case, WHOOPEE, something about Dareus! Wait a minute! Don't they know that Dareus ALREADY has "broken out"?
The first time we had ever been in the BCS national championship game, ESPN trots out old Brent Musberger, who obviously had at best glanced a little at this or that tape of our team without really doing the homework necessary to really know what he was talking about. A perfect example: "Upchurch is a terrific receiver." Now wait a minute, Brent. You could count maybe on one hand the number of passes Roy Upchurch ever caught for Alabama. Roy Upchurch was a favorite of mine, but all you have really told me here is that in all probability the only homework you did concerning my team was to read the writeup of the Alabama-Auburn game, when Upchurch had caught that pass in the endzone at the end of the game.