Jeez. We're trying to convince you he's not worth talking about. You seem to have a strange obsession with him.
At the expense of bringing it up again, the context for my past few statements are more along the lines of how ridiculous expectations can be, in particular with Texas. The notion that successful itself isn't enough, that it's measured by a handicap of how good a recruiter you are. Which, I brought up in relation to Saban as well.
Think about it this way, why isn't Saban a coach of the year candidate every year? He has one of the best teams, right? They say oh well he had a lot of talent, so his results are not that spectacular, even if he takes a bunch of inexperienced players and makes a title run. Instead of crediting Saban for being a great recruiter, they act like it makes his performance as a coach worse relative to the talent.
This entire mentality is warped. Being a great recruiter is one way of being a great coach. It's ridiculous for any program, Alabama, or otherwise to disparage a great recruiter as being bad at his job merely because his performance doesn't meet their expectations of the talent
he recruited. As I said, (I know, bringing up Wimp again, sorry...) Wimp was that type of coach. He had 5 first round draft picks on one team, 5! He didn't even make it out of the Sweet 16. As I've come to accept though, it doesn't make him a bad coach overall, he was a great recruiter and that produced great results.
Gregg Marshall might go the other way. He might not be a great recruiter, and if he's not people will want to get upset about that. I don't care though, I care about wins, I want to see some consistency. If Gregg Marshall can't lure top name recruits, and still gets into the tournament? So be it, great I'll applaud him. I'm not going to be that guy that goes oh well Gregg didn't win the SEC, he didn't make the Final Four, all he did was go to the NCAA tournament the last four years so let's get rid of him. That in my opinion is a foolish way to judge a coach.