October email surprise...

[NationalTitles18]

That would have been great advice for the mainstream media during the Russia investigation. Every day the media hammered away only to find out that the team of trained lawyers that spent tens of millions of dollars said no collusion.

That's all I needed to know. Thanks for playing. If you believe this then your opinion on the Hunter Biden non story is not anything I'm interested in. Your ignorance is astounding.

 

[92tide]

wasn't pumpkin pinochet supposed to write his campaign a big check? i figured that might be one of the october surprises

 

[Akazo]

That's all I needed to know. Thanks for playing. If you believe this then your opinion on the Hunter Biden non story is not anything I'm interested in. Your ignorance is astounding.

My only comment on the story so far is have an honest investigation. I'm not sure where that is ignorant... I have plainly said that there are a lot of suspect issues but there are verified aspects that confirm that at least some of the emails are authentic. Let's have an investigation. Why would that be controversial?

 

[NationalTitles18]

My only comment on the story so far is have an honest investigation. I'm not sure where that is ignorant... I have plainly said that there are a lot of suspect issues but there are verified aspects that confirm that at least some of the emails are authentic. Let's have an investigation. Why would that be controversial?

1. Investigations take place behind closed doors. Furthermore, the FBI has a mission to stay out of the political fray close to elections. You are asking for a ruse to be given credence on election eve. It is folly.

2. Your ignorance is in regard to the Russian investigation. If you believe the Bill Barr propaganda on the Muller Report then I need know no more - you are blind and ignorant on these matters. Blinded by partisan politics and willfully ignorant of the truth.

Far be it from me to tell you how to live your life, but as one who escaped the Fox News nonsense may I suggest that you expand your intellectual horizons?

 

[TexasBama]

wasn't pumpkin pinochet supposed to write his campaign a big check? i figured that might be one of the october surprises

Is the surprise that he's got a big enough balance to cover a check?

 

[MattinBama]

That would have been great advice for the mainstream media during the Russia investigation. Every day the media hammered away only to find out that the team of trained lawyers that spent tens of millions of dollars said no collusion.

That is absolutely not what was said and for someone that wanted that investigation followed through to its conclusion I’m sure you’ve been writing in angrily over Barr ending the investigation too early.

 

[92tide]

That is absolutely not what was said and for someone that wanted that investigation followed through to its conclusion I’m sure you’ve been writing in angrily over Barr ending the investigation too early.

"investigation" means a non-stop, un-questioning airing of trump talking points.

 

[B1GTide]

All of this concern is heart warming.

 

[Akazo]

1. Investigations take place behind closed doors. Furthermore, the FBI has a mission to stay out of the political fray close to elections. You are asking for a ruse to be given credence on election eve. It is folly.

2. Your ignorance is in regard to the Russian investigation. If you believe the Bill Barr propaganda on the Muller Report then I need know no more - you are blind and ignorant on these matter. Blinded by partisan politics and willfully ignorant of the truth.

Far be it from me to tell you how to live your life, but as one who escaped the Fox News nonsense may I suggest that you expand your intellectual horizons?

1. Agreed and they are... you are assuming it is a ruse before the investigation is concluded. I have no conclusions, none whatsoever, so I am not the one willfully ingoring things. I'm the only one saying don't jump to conclusions and do an honest investigation.
2. Read the Mueller report... Mueller said no provable collusion, not Barr. Obstruction is another issue.

 

[B1GTide]

I didn't know that the board hired a comedian.

 

[Chukker Veteran]

I just read through these three pages...that's all the time I have squandered on this hairbrained BS, and that was too much.

We've got a guy insisting there was no collusion between Trump and Russia and people are trying to have a reasonable discussion with him?

Getting down in the details to refute this current distraction is like trying to address all the details that made it clear Obama was born in Kenya.

Fool me once...

 

[NationalTitles18]

1. Agreed and they are... you are assuming it is a ruse before the investigation is concluded. I have no conclusions, none whatsoever, so I am not the one willfully ingoring things. I'm the only one saying don't jump to conclusions and do an honest investigation.
2. Read the Mueller report... Mueller said no provable collusion, not Barr. Obstruction is another issue.

Mueller did not say there was no collusion. I’m sure you can quote chapter and verse if I’m wrong.

Why give credence to an election ploy from a known conman on election eve? Seriously...why?! What and whose purpose would it serve? Who stands to gain from acting as if it were credible with no proof it is? You are running in reverse and screaming for someone to slam on the gas. Prove it’s credible, which is easily done with metadata, and then let’s talk about it.

 

[Chukker Veteran]

Mueller did not say there was no collusion. I’m sure you can quote chapter and verse if I’m wrong.

Why give credence to an election ploy from a known conman on election eve? Seriously...why?! What and whose purpose would it serve? Who stands to gain from acting as if it were credible with no proof it is? You are running in reverse and screaming for someone to slam on the gas. Prove it’s credible, which is easily done with metadata, and then let’s talk about it.

The amazing thing is how the loyal dupes fall for each new con he sends down the tubes. It's almost like they want to prove they are beyond reason.

 

[NationalTitles18]

Not only running in reverse but want someone to declare you are going forward in 5th gear while wondering why you aren’t getting anywhere. It makes no sense except as politically motivated malevolence. That’s where you are, either intentionally or from ignorance.

 

[92tide]

Mueller did not say there was no collusion. I’m sure you can quote chapter and verse if I’m wrong.

Why give credence to an election ploy from a known conman on election eve? Seriously...why?! What and whose purpose would it serve? Who stands to gain from acting as if it were credible with no proof it is?

 

[Bamaro]

That would have been great advice for the mainstream media during the Russia investigation. Every day the media hammered away only to find out that the team of trained lawyers that spent tens of millions of dollars said no collusion. Why was Trump tried in the media? Why was he constantly presumed guilty by the same media? My point is that both sides are guilty of doing the same things and when the Republicans are on the receiving end they say the exact same thing you just said. And, likewise, the Democrats now that the shoe is on the proverbial other foot. I wish it would stop, but sadly the country is too divided.

Really? You must not have been paying attention.

 

[TIDE-HSV]

An excellent Politico article...

Politico

 

[Go Bama]

Read the Mueller report... Mueller said no provable collusion, not Barr. Obstruction is another issue.

Since you read the Mueller Report, have you forgotten what was on page 2 of Volume 1? It's right there at the beginning.

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign “coordinat[ed]” — a term that appears in the appointment order — with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, “coordination” does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement — tacit or express — between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests.1 We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

I also wonder if you missed this from page 1 of Volume 1.

As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents. The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.

There were multiple indictments and subsequent imprisonments from the Mueller Report.

I don't think you read the report at all.

 

[NationalTitles18]

Since you read the Mueller Report, have you forgotten what was on page 2 of Volume 1. It's right there at the beginning.



I also wonder if you missed this from page 1 of Volume 1.



There were multiple indictments and subsequent imprisonments from the Mueller Report.

I don't think you read the report at all.

Let's not forget the video of Trump himself asking Russia to hack and release the emails. That's evidence he was all for it that is undeniable without denying reality in the process.

 

[Jon]

Let's not forget the video of Trump himself asking Russia to hack and release the emails. That's evidence he was all for it that is undeniable without denying reality in the process.

or the fact that he recently publicly called for all the Mueller info to be released underacted and then had his legal goons go to court to keep it from actually happening