Sidebar

Paper; Global Warming "The Biggest Science Scandal Ever"

Status
Not open for further replies.
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,466
53,338
287
56
East Point, Ga, USA
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
Or it could be "Phase I of We Are Only In It For the Money".

Maybe it was the other way around............now, I have to try to find where those LPs are stashed away. (Getting old stinks.)
 
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
Yeah, just as I thought.................I had it backwards.

Thanks to the marvel of the innerwebs, I don't have to sift through stuff from over 40 years ago. Wherever it is now.

 
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,466
53,338
287
56
East Point, Ga, USA
cuda.1973 said:
Or it could be "Phase I of We Are Only In It For the Money".

Maybe it was the other way around............now, I have to try to find where those LPs are stashed away. (Getting old stinks.)
Click to expand...
well, until it's outlawed, i may just show them my thumb and work at a gas station

a good buddy of mine has the entire collection digitally and is going to dump it on a hard drive for me.
 
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
OK, question for the day..............

Which Presidential candidate is most likely to enact "total criminalization"? IOW, outlaw music.

"Music leads to big troubles. Look what it did to Joe."

I would have to say Hitlery, since she is the biggest criminal, and bringing us all down to her level might save her from Leavenworth.

(Which was the point of that album.) ("Just look at Iran.")

"Information is not knowledge.
Knowledge is not wisdom.
Wisdom is not truth.
Truth is not beauty.
Beauty is not love.
Love is not music.
Music is THE BEST.
Wisdom is the domain of the Wis,
Which is extinct.
Beauty is a French phonetic corruption
Of a short cloth neck ornament
Currently in resurgence."
 
Last edited:
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
92tide said:
a good buddy of mine has the entire collection digitally and is going to dump it on a hard drive for me.
Click to expand...
Does that include Thing Fish? Which, by his own admission is "too #### weird to be on Broadway, or anywhere else, for that matter".

I may have to buy you a HD, since I do not own around 1/3 of his stuff.

OK, enough inside jokes, and back to poking fun of The First Church of Climatology. And L. Ron Hoover.

I mean AlGor. (Not to be confused with Sy Borg.)

"You have just destroyed one Model XQ-J37 nuclear-powered..................."
 
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,466
53,338
287
56
East Point, Ga, USA
cuda.1973 said:
Does that include Thing Fish? Which, by his own admission is "too #### weird to be on Broadway, or anywhere else, for that matter".

I may have to buy you a HD, since I do not own around 1/3 of his stuff.

OK, enough inside jokes, and back to poking fun of The First Church of Climatology. And L. Ron Hoover.

I mean AlGor. (Not to be confused with Sy Borg.)

"You have just destroyed one Model XQ-J37 nuclear-powered..................."
Click to expand...
ill have to check, but i think it does. he said it was pretty much a complete catalog as of 3-4 years ago.

thing fish is pretty weird.
 
AUDub

AUDub

Suspended
Dec 4, 2013
18,481
7,796
187
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
rjtide said:
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

Interesting. It says NOAA hid data showing a period of global cooling.
Click to expand...
That's just silly. The NOAA didn't hide anything. The starting point for the graphs was 1979 to align the radiosonde record with the UAH and RSS satellite datasets, which started in 1979. And that Radiosonde data he's using came from (guess who?) the NOAA. That's right, they're so intent on keeping this secret that they not only included it in this brief, they show it on pretty much ever dag blasted temperature record and proxy reconstruction that dates back that far. Very sneaky. Look at pages 5 and 6.

Further, the writer took the graph for troposphere atmospheric data points from a 1978 graph that displays standard deviations from the mean of a data set between 1950-1977 and then lined up the mean of that graph to the mean of the NOAA graph, which uses an entirely different data set (1979-2015). Two entirely different means. Thus the deviations and subsequent analysis would be meaningless. If you were to do this right you would need the raw data points of the whole (1950-2015) and then do a whole new analysis with a new mean over the entire period and then run the corresponding stdevs.

Don't take the article you shared seriously. Guy has no idea what he's doing. His analysis is meaningless.
 
Last edited:
92tide

92tide

TideFans Legend
May 9, 2000
61,466
53,338
287
56
East Point, Ga, USA
AUDub said:
That's just silly. The NOAA didn't hide anything. The starting point for the graphs was 1979 to align the radiosonde record with the UAH and RSS satellite datasets, which started in 1979. And that Radiosonde data he's using came from (guess who?) the NOAA. That's right, they're so intent on keeping this secret that they not only included it in this brief, they show it on pretty much ever dag blasted temperature record and proxy reconstruction that dates back that far. Very sneaky. Look at pages 5 and 6.

Further, the writer took the graph for troposphere atmospheric data points from a 1978 graph that displays standard deviations from the mean of a data set between 1950-1977 and then lined up the mean of that graph to the mean of the NOAA graph, which uses an entirely different data set (1979-2015). Two entirely different means. Thus the deviations and subsequent analysis would be meaningless. If you were to do this right you would need the raw data points of the whole (1950-2015) and then do a whole new analysis with a new mean over the entire period and then run the corresponding stdevs.

Don't take the article you shared seriously. Guy has no idea what he's doing. His analysis is meaningless.
Click to expand...
that seems to be a common occurrence
 
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
So, the fascists that run the gubbament want to prosecute "deniers" under RICO statutes?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...eral-we-may-prosecute-climate-change-deniers/

Meanwhile, we have a former Secretary of State that should be in front of a grand jury, charged with violating the Espionage Act, but anyone who disagrees with this hoax is a criminal?

Insane.

Oh, before some of you want to lecture me about how I do not know anything about science, etc. (without knowing anything about me or my background)..............save your breath.

To quote that poignant line from Repo Man...............

"Do I have to come over to your house and shove your dog's head down the toilet?"

There, that sums up my feelings.

How does it feel when someone uses your own Alinsky tactics, and throws it back in your face.
 
cuda.1973

cuda.1973

Hall of Fame
Dec 6, 2009
8,506
607
137
Allen, Texas
WHAT? The alarmists use Stalinist tactics? I'm shocked...................

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/23/alarmists-airbrush-judith-curry-women-climate-science-history/

She originally appeared last year on a list of “20 women making waves in the climate change debate” on the website of the International Council for Science. (The ICSU was founded in 1931 to “promote international scientific activity in the different branches of science and its application for the benefit of humanity”)

But when an alarmist organisation in Australia called The Climate Council appropriated the list for its own propaganda purposes, the 20 women were mysteriously reduced to 19.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

|

Latest threads

Top Bottom