Canceling spring games is just one example of a broader shift in college football, where the interests of fans seem to be taking a backseat. Whether it's conference realignment forcing longtime rivals to stop playing each other, games moving to exclusive streaming platforms, or changes to traditional aspects of the sport, the focus has increasingly shifted toward maximizing revenue rather than maintaining what made college football special in the first place.
The passion of the fans is what fuels college football. If programs continue to take away opportunities for fan engagement, whether through canceled spring games or other changes, they risk damaging the foundation of the sport.
Too late.If programs continue to take away opportunities for fan engagement, whether through canceled spring games or other changes, they risk damaging the foundation of the sport.
I thought it was funny that he used SHSU as the FCS example when they're now an FBS program that won 10 games last year.I like his ideas:
Fix the insane May transfer portal and allow (but don't require) teams to schedule the 1AA opponent UT-Martin) for the spring.
He cleared that up on last night's show. It was just a habit thing because they've been FCS for so long.I thought it was funny that he used SHSU as the FCS example when they're now an FBS program that won 10 games last year.![]()
Yeah, I had to think a bit for a school I was pretty sure was still 1AA. (I hope UT-Martin is still 1AA).I thought it was funny that he used SHSU as the FCS example when they're now an FBS program that won 10 games last year.![]()
We had a scrimmage against Memphis and Wake Forrest in basketball before the season started this year, so why not do that in football too?Yeah, I had to think a bit for a school I was pretty sure was still 1AA. (I hope UT-Martin is still 1AA).
Anyway, rather than playing UT Martin in the fall, I'd consider going to see Bama play UTM in a "friendly" in the spring. And ESPN would probably air it.
No offense 4QBC but I remember hating your idea when NIL first began a thing. Now I'd gladly get behind it after seeing the carnage NIL continues to create. Amateur athletics-- at least as far as football is concerned-- is now (un)officially extinct.The transfer portal has been more damaging than pay-for-play. Makes it impossible for coaches to plan, let alone build, a roster. Severs the connection between players and fans. Which is slowly eroding the fans' connection with athletics in general.
The only thing I see that can fix it is a players union and a CBA. Unless and until that happens, we'll continue to slide down a slippery slope until we hit the cesspool at the bottom.
No offense taken. I didn't like the idea 2 years ago and still really don't.No offense 4QBC but I remember hating your idea when NIL first began a thing. Now I'd gladly get behind it after seeing the carnage NIL continues to create. Amateur athletics-- at least as far as football is concerned-- is now (un)officially extinct.
Someone is going to have to convince the majority of players who aren't making the big bucks and who are getting pennies on the dollar compared to the elite players to create/join a union. Because the elite players are the ones currently benefitting from this wild wild west landscape we have now. All we hear about are people like Ryan Williams, Jeremiah Smith, Carson Beck who are getting literally millions of dollars under the current "system". But what we're not hearing about are the rest of the players who are getting pennies on the dollar compared to the elite players, when under a CBA, could get more equitable deals and protection across the board compared to how it is now. You can't force a union on people who don't want it. So you have to convince the majority they need one.No offense taken. I didn't like the idea 2 years ago and still really don't.
I just don't see an alternative that would (1) fix the problem and its myriad corollaries, (2) stand up in court, (3) be uniformly applicable across all 50 states, and (4) have the backing of a no-foolin' enforcement arm...in this case, the NLRB.
I don’t see this as highly probable today, but still a non-zero chance a few years out.Someone is going to have to convince the majority of players who aren't making the big bucks and who are getting pennies on the dollar compared to the elite players to create/join a union. Because the elite players are the ones currently benefitting from this wild wild west landscape we have now. All we hear about are people like Ryan Williams, Jeremiah Smith, Carson Beck who are getting literally millions of dollars under the current "system". But what we're not hearing about are the rest of the players who are getting pennies on the dollar compared to the elite players, when under a CBA, could get more equitable deals and protection across the board compared to how it is now. You can't force a union on people who don't want it. So you have to convince the majority they need one.
That would take the majority of the colleges agreeing to do it, but some lawyer would file "collusion" charges against every one of the universities.I don’t see this as highly probable today, but still a non-zero chance a few years out.
What if the colleges instituted a lockout, refusing to negotiate one-on-one, demanding to deal collectively with a union?
One reason they'd have to get legislation passed stating they aren't subject to anti-trust laws.That would take the majority of the colleges agreeing to do it, but some lawyer would file "collusion" charges against every one of the universities.