Not trying to be a sore loser or look for excuses... just want clarified the way instant replay is to be used.
I was under the impression that in order for an on the field call to be overturned, there had to be "indisputable, unquestionable evidence" to have the call reversed.
If that is the case, then 2 of the reverses were incorrect.
I just watched a CSTV SEC Game room discussion on the topic and they thought the rule was as I thought- and all 3 agreed that some of the calls should not have been overturned.
It seemed Saturday that the replay was being used to make a call instead of reviewing a call...
Anyone know the way the rule is and how it is supposed to be interpreted?
I was under the impression that in order for an on the field call to be overturned, there had to be "indisputable, unquestionable evidence" to have the call reversed.
If that is the case, then 2 of the reverses were incorrect.
I just watched a CSTV SEC Game room discussion on the topic and they thought the rule was as I thought- and all 3 agreed that some of the calls should not have been overturned.
It seemed Saturday that the replay was being used to make a call instead of reviewing a call...
Anyone know the way the rule is and how it is supposed to be interpreted?