Russia Invades Ukraine XIX

As I have said before. The accession decision will have to be unanimous. My guess is that Turkey or Hungary would be the toad in the road on Ukrainian admission. Or France.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: Bazza
As I have said before. The accession decision will have to be unanimous. My guess is that Turkey or Hungary would be the toad in the road on Ukrainian admission. Or France.
Quite likely true, but that's not what Trump said. It's pretty clear who holds all the cards as far as he's concerned.
 
As I have said before. The accession decision will have to be unanimous. My guess is that Turkey or Hungary would be the toad in the road on Ukrainian admission. Or France.
Maybe. IIRC, it was mainly France and Germany who placed the "poison pill" of no admittance for states with an existing territorial dispute to keep Georgia out. I just don't see Ukraine signing anything which would give up their claims to the Donbas forever, which would be what it would take for admission. I think that Georgia considers itself every bit as much "European" as Ukraine. Sometimes, my wife and I watch a little Youtube travelog called "Little Chinese Everywhere." The primary narrator is a Chinese girl, early 30s, now joined by her German husband. Both are fluent in English and he's fluent in Mandarin, to the point that Chinese as him if he's Chinese, despite his German/European looks. Her vlog concerns itself largely with Chinese provinces, but with other countries also. She spent a lot of time in Georgia, talking with ordinary people, not with politicians. She, at the end of her Georgian sojourn, asked that question and concluded that Georgians very much wanted to be part of the West. Of course that's just one viewpoint. I think the same is true of almost all Ukrainians outside Donbas - they want to be European and not be embraced by the Russian bear...
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: UAH
Maybe. IIRC, it was mainly France and Germany who placed the "poison pill" of no admittance for states with an existing territorial dispute to keep Georgia out. I just don't see Ukraine signing anything which would give up their claims to the Donbas forever, which would be what it would take for admission. I think that Georgia considers itself every bit as much "European" as Ukraine. Sometimes, my wife and I watch a little Youtube travelog called "Little Chinese Everywhere." The primary narrator is a Chinese girl, early 30s, now joined by her German husband. Both are fluent in English and he's fluent in Mandarin, to the point that Chinese as him if he's Chinese, despite his German/European looks. Her vlog concerns itself largely with Chinese provinces, but with other countries also. She spent a lot of time in Georgia, talking with ordinary people, not with politicians. She, at the end of her Georgian sojourn, asked that question and concluded that Georgians very much wanted to be part of the West. Of course that's just one viewpoint. I think the same is true of almost all Ukrainians outside Donbas - they want to be European and not be embraced by the Russian bear...
I'd be very surprised if Zelensky de jure ceded Crimea and Malorossiya. He might acknowledge it is de facto occupied and agree not to settle things militarily, but de jure? I serious doubt it. That would put things in a situation similar to Taiwan. Not good, but better than nothing.
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: UAH
Quite likely true, but that's not what Trump said. It's pretty clear who holds all the cards as far as he's concerned.
Just after September 11th 2001, Pentagon planners realized that the only way to get into Afghanistan was to invade through Uzbekistan, which was led by a very unsavory dictator, Karimov.
The US rep showed up with a check book and said, "What's it going to take to get basing rights?"
Karimov said, "Stop saying I'm a scummy dictator and give me $100M."
"Done."

The US could urge other NATO members to admit Ukraine, but some would probably demand bribes like Karimov. I do not think the check book is open to them the way it was to Karimov.
 
If Ukrainians outside Donbas want to be European then de facto cede the Donbas to Russia and admit the rest of Ukraine to NATO. Same with Moldova.

What would be unreal, but in the current case highly likley, is if France, Hungary, and Turkey all approved it but Trump was the holdout toad vote...

What this war is missing and our political climate is missing is to start calling bluffs on some of the ridiculous positions by perceived power brokers...

Maybe. IIRC, it was mainly France and Germany who placed the "poison pill" of no admittance for states with an existing territorial dispute to keep Georgia out. I just don't see Ukraine signing anything which would give up their claims to the Donbas forever, which would be what it would take for admission. I think that Georgia considers itself every bit as much "European" as Ukraine. Sometimes, my wife and I watch a little Youtube travelog called "Little Chinese Everywhere." The primary narrator is a Chinese girl, early 30s, now joined by her German husband. Both are fluent in English and he's fluent in Mandarin, to the point that Chinese as him if he's Chinese, despite his German/European looks. Her vlog concerns itself largely with Chinese provinces, but with other countries also. She spent a lot of time in Georgia, talking with ordinary people, not with politicians. She, at the end of her Georgian sojourn, asked that question and concluded that Georgians very much wanted to be part of the West. Of course that's just one viewpoint. I think the same is true of almost all Ukrainians outside Donbas - they want to be European and not be embraced by the Russian bear...
 
Worth every life and penny in the long run. Pay the money and keep the receipts. The bill will come due sooner or later for these profiteering countries.

Just after September 11th 2001, Pentagon planners realized that the only way to get into Afghanistan was to invade through Uzbekistan, which was led by a very unsavory dictator, Karimov.
The US rep showed up with a check book and said, "What's it going to take to get basing rights?"
Karimov said, "Stop saying I'm a scummy dictator and give me $100M."
"Done."

The US could urge other NATO members to admit Ukraine, but some would probably demand bribes like Karimov. I do not think the check book is open to them the way it was to Karimov.
 
If Ukrainians outside Donbas want to be European then de facto cede the Donbas to Russia and admit the rest of Ukraine to NATO. Same with Moldova.

What would be unreal, but in the current case highly likley, is if France, Hungary, and Turkey all approved it but Trump was the holdout toad vote...

What this war is missing and our political climate is missing is to start calling bluffs on some of the ridiculous positions by perceived power brokers...
Trump did pass my mind...
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDCrimson
Worth every life and penny in the long run. Pay the money and keep the receipts. The bill will come due sooner or later for these profiteering countries.
That is just how international affairs is done.
Turkey has said that they did not want Sweden in because a Danish man had burned a Koran in Stockholm. The real reason was that they wanted F-35s so if they have another go at Greece they will have F-35s. So, behind doors, the Turks told the US, "You want Sweden in NATO. We will vote yes, if you sell us F-35s."
 
I had a professor in grad school (International Affairs, Troy State U.) who had been Deputy Chief of Mission in a small African country.
There was an anti-Israel vote coming up in the UN General Assembly condemning Israel for something (because it was a day ending in "y") and the US was canvasing friendly states asking them to vote the same way as the US. He met the foreign minister of the country and asked him what it would take to secure his country's vote..
He said, "We want an international-grade hotel in the capital."
So the US built them a hotel.
This is how international affairs is done.
 
Here is an article from the Hill on the events in Washington:
5 takeaways from the Trump-Zelensky White House meeting
Five points.
A positive tone but few specifics (Not surprising at this stage)
Europeans succeeded in shoring up Zelensky (The Euro leaders wanted to avoid a repeat of the debacle of the last Trump-Zelensky meeting in Washington)
Interim ceasefire is rare point of contention (von der Leyen says Ukraine should have an "article V-like security guarantee." Not NATO membership, but a close equivalent. "Let’s try to put pressure on Russia,” Merz said, although the EU imported "over half of the ... coal and 43% of imported natural gas" from Russia last year.
Trump vouches for Putin’s desire to make peace (I'm sure he is, and whether he accepts and abides by it depends on the terms and condition of the final agreement)
Huge stakes if a trilateral meeting happens (a face-to-face meeting could be a make or break meeting).

As long the Europeans are willing to step up and really do what they say, there is a chance
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bazza and pelleas
What this war is missing and our political climate is missing is to start calling bluffs on some of the ridiculous positions by perceived power brokers...

But you have nervous nellies who keep fretting, "He's got nukes!" every time Vlad makes a threat. So we should just give him everything he wants. That's pretty much what Trump is doing.
 
But you have nervous nellies who keep fretting, "He's got nukes!" every time Vlad makes a threat. So we should just give him everything he wants. That's pretty much what Trump is doing.

Ha ha.......after 4 LONG years under the former guy - and now Trump 8 months into his term......is at fault - for giving Putin "everything he wants"?

Right......

:rolleyes:
 
But you have nervous nellies who keep fretting, "He's got nukes!" every time Vlad makes a threat.
The sad reality is that he DOES have nukes. If we were to attempt to put US troops in Ukraine then who knows what a caged rat (Putin, not Trump) would do when cornered. Trump and the EU leaders are well aware of this which is why they have to walk a tightrope between diplomacy and sanctions. It's just not anywhere near obvious what the correct answer is, regardless of the opinions on this message board.
 
Opinion: The Donbas is a poisoned chalice that neither Russia nor Ukraine should want

Whichever side in the Russo-Ukrainian War wins the Donbas loses the war.

That is the savage and largely unacknowledged irony at the core of the struggle over the Donbas — a territory that has recently come to occupy center stage in President Trump’s post-summit thinking about how to end the war.

The Donbas was the industrial powerhouse of the Soviet Union for decades, but the region was already going into decline by the 1970s and 1980s. When Ukraine became independent in 1991, it inherited what had largely become a value-destroying territory. The Donbas fed the corrupt appetites of local politicians, oligarchs and organized crime. Its working-class residents claimed to have an exalted status belied by a wretched reality.

In 2016, Aslund estimated that it would cost some $20 billion to revive the Donbas. By 2025, the estimated cost of Ukraine’s reconstruction had zoomed upward to $524 billion, a 26-fold increase. Much of that money would need to go to the Donbas, where most of the heaviest fighting has taken place.

A reasonable guesstimate of how much it would cost to rebuild just the Donbas today is $200 billion — nearly one-tenth of Russia’s reported annual GDP and slightly more than Ukraine’s. If the fighting continues indefinitely, that sum will surely double or even triple.
 
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been caught rolling her eyes at the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The hilarious moment was caught on camera as Merz attempted to lecture US President Donald Trump about achieving a ceasefire. Meloni, seemingly uninterested, rolled her eyes when the German Chancellor said a ceasefire must take place before a trilateral meeting takes place. In another comical moment from the Italian Prime Minister during the meeting, she had a hot mic moment while talking to Trump. The Italian Prime Minister joked about how Trump loved talking to his press and she hated talking to hers. Despite her humorous moments, Meloni commended Trump’s efforts to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

 
Here is an article from the Hill on the events in Washington:
5 takeaways from the Trump-Zelensky White House meeting
Five points.
A positive tone but few specifics (Not surprising at this stage)
Europeans succeeded in shoring up Zelensky (The Euro leaders wanted to avoid a repeat of the debacle of the last Trump-Zelensky meeting in Washington)
Interim ceasefire is rare point of contention (von der Leyen says Ukraine should have an "article V-like security guarantee." Not NATO membership, but a close equivalent. "Let’s try to put pressure on Russia,” Merz said, although the EU imported "over half of the ... coal and 43% of imported natural gas" from Russia last year.
Trump vouches for Putin’s desire to make peace (I'm sure he is, and whether he accepts and abides by it depends on the terms and condition of the final agreement)
Huge stakes if a trilateral meeting happens (a face-to-face meeting could be a make or break meeting).

As long the Europeans are willing to step up and really do what they say, there is a chance

I don't see any good outcome of a 3-party meeting. Trump has basically given the terms of "peace" that Putin wanted: Absolute control of Crimea, Donbas and Zaporizha(sp.). Not giving an inch of territory illegally gained.

There is no way Zelenskyy will accede to such surrender.

Putin must have some dirty pictures on Trump. The more Trump kisses up to him, the more I think the pee tape is a real thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: some_al_fan and UAH
Advertisement

Trending content

Advertisement

Latest threads